Potential of Youth Participation in Local Territory Branding Management

Authors

  • Maria Pevnaya Ural Federal University, Department of Sociology and Public Administration Technologies
  • Svetlana Kostina Ural Federal University, Department of Sociology and Public Administration Technologies
  • Mariana Cernicova-Bucă Politehnica University Timisoara, Department of Communication and Foreign Languages
  • Jerzy Kazmierczyk Poznan University of Economics and Business, Department of Education and Personnel Development
  • Lilit Asoyan Shirak State University, Department of history and philosophy

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4335/20.1.193-214(2022)

Keywords:

branding, social participation, territory attractiveness, potential for participation, youth

Abstract

The purpose of this article is an attempt to determine the main characteristics of the potential for youth participation in branding of territory for the implementation of a scientific approach to branding of cities with the participation of residents in different countries. This is the first article that relatively approaches the issue of youth participation in branding of places and takes into account different experiences of countries. The results of a survey of young people in several cities in Poland, Romania, Armenia, Russia were used to develop a model of the potential for youth participation in territory branding on the basis of two scales – attractiveness of the territory and willingness of youth to participate in promoting settlements of their residence. Cross-country differences in the representation of various youth groups were identified in terms of their potential for participating in the branding of local territories. The model can be used as a basis for the development of urban programs for involving youth in territory branding. These programs do not differ significantly across countries and cities. However, the model can be used at the first stage of the development of such programs to highlight the specifics of each territory based on an assessment of the potential according to the research presented in the article.

References

Agyeman, J., McLaren, D. & Schaefer-Borrego, А. (2013) Sharing cities. (Friends of the Earth), available at: http://media.ontheplatform.org.uk/sites/default/files/agyeman_sharing_cities.pdf (June 20, 2021).

Anholt, S. (2007) Competitive identity: the new brand management for nations, cities and regions (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan UK), https://doi.org/10.1057 / 9780230627727.

Bagirova, A. & Notman, O. (2020) The well-being of residents in an urban environment: the case of a Russian megapolis, Administratie si Management Public, 35, рр. 124-138, https://doi.org/10.24818/amp/2020.35-08.

Berner, M., Amos, J. & Morse, R. (2011) What constitutes effective citizen participation in local government? Views from city stakeholders, Public Administration Quarterly, 35(1), pp.128-163.

Beyerlein, K. & Hipp J. (2006) A Two-Stage Model for a Two-Stage Process: How Biographical Availability Matters for Social Movement Mobilization, Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 11(3), pp. 299–320, https://doi.org/10.17813/maiq.11.3.8p1758741377684u.

Braun, E., Kavaratzis, M. & Zenker, S. (2013) My city – my brand: the different roles of residents in place branding, Journal of Place Management and Development, 6(1), pp. 18-28.

Cernicova-Bucă, M., Zhuk, E. S. & Zhuk, A. A. (2016) City branding at the state frontier. A comparative view on Romanian and Russian experiences, In: Boldea, I. (ed.) Globalization and National Identity. Studies on the Strategies of Intercultural Dialogue. Communication, public relations and journalism section (Tirgu Mures: Arhipelag XXI Press), pp. 89-101.

Duarte Melo, A. (2011) City Rankings and the Citizens: Exposing Representational and Participatory Gaps, In: Pereira, P., Ribeiro, R., Oliveira, I. & Novais, P. (eds) Society with Future: Smart and Liveable Cities (Cham: Springer), pp. 154-169, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45293-3.

Eyssen, I. C., Steultjens, M. P., Dekker, J. & Terwee C. B. (2011) A Systematic Review of Instruments Assessing Participation: Challenges in Defining Participation, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 92 (6), pp. 983-997, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2011.01.006.

Flanagan, C. & Levine, P. (2010) Civic Engagement and the Transition to Adulthood, The Future of Children, 20(1), pp. 159-179.

Florida, R. (2005) Cities and the creative class (New York: Routledge).

Fung, A. (2006) Varieties of participation in complex governance, Public Administration Review, 66, pp. 66-75.

Gaby, S. (2017) The Civic Engagement Gap(s): Youth Participation and Inequality From 1976 to 2009, Youth & Society, 49(7), pp. 923-946, https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X16678155.

Go, F. M., Lemmetyinen, A. & Hakala, U. (2015) Harnessing Place Branding through Cultural Entrepreneurship (Palgrave Macmillan UK), https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137465160.

Govers, R. (2018) Imaginative communities. Admired cities, regions and countries (Antwerp: Reputo Press).

Govers, R. & Go, F. (2009) Place Branding: Glocal, Virtual and Physical Identities. Constructed, Imagined and Experienced (Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan), https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-24559-4.

Hollands, R. G. (2008) Will the real smart city please stand up? Intelligent, progressive or entrepreneurial? City, 12 (3), pp. 303-320.

Houghton, J. P. & Stevens, A. (2011) in Chapter 6. City branding and stakeholder engagement, In: Dinnie, K. City branding: theory and cases (Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire; New York: Palgrave Macmillan), pp. 45–53.

Huhn, R., Brantes Ferreira, J., Angilberto SDF, & Leao, F. (2018) The effects of social media opinion leaders' recommendations on followers’ intention to buy, Review of Business Management, 20(1), pp.57–73.

Kavaratzis, M. (2012) From ‘Necessary Evil’ to Necessity: Stakeholders’ Involvement in Place Branding, Journal of Place Management and Development, 5(1), рр. 7-19.

Kelley, D. R. (2003) After Communism: Perspectives on Democracy (University of Arkansas Press).

Little, S. (2020) Engaging Youth in Placemaking: Modified Behavior Mapping, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(18), p. 6527, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186527.

Loebach, J. E., Little, S., Cox, A. & Owens, P. E. (2020) Routledge Handbook of Designing Public Spaces for Young People. Processes, Practices and Policies for Youth Inclusion (Routledge: New York).

Maziashvili, M. & Kowalik, I. (2021) City citizenship behavior and participation in promotion, Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, https://doi.org/10.1057 / s41254-020-00194-z.

Muhammad, S. (2020) Civic engagement, youth socialization and participation in public spheres in Indonesia, Children and Youth Services Review, 19, 105669, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105669

Notman, O. V. & Bagirova, A. P. (2018) Attractiveness of megalopolis public spaces as evaluated by its residents (through the example of shopping and entertainments centers and park zones of Yekaterinburg), Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes, 6, рр. 347-364, https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2018.6.16.

Piškur, B., Daniëls, R., Jongmans, M. J., Ketelaar, M., Norton, M. & Beurskens A JHM. (2014) Participation and social participation: are they distinct concepts?, Clinical Rehabilitation, 28(3), pp. 211-220, https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215513499029.

Radwanowicz-Wanczewska, J. & Dąbek D. (2018) Challenges of the Implementation of the European Charter of Local Self-Government in Polish Legislation, Lex localis - Journal of Local Self-Government, 16(4), рр. 971-982, https://doi.org/10.4335/18.3.927-939(2020).

Reaven, M. (2020) Neighborhood Activism in Planning for New York City, 1945-1975, Journal of Urban History, 46(6), pp. 1261-1289, doi:10.1177/0096144217705446.

Sánchez, J. I., Papaoikonomou, V. E. & Ginieis, M. (2021) Exploring the strategic communication of the sharing city project through frame analysis: The case of Barcelona sharing city, Cities, 110, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.103082.

Skinner, H. (2021) Place Branding—The Challenges of Getting It Right: Coping with Success and Rebuilding from Crises, Tourism and Hospitality, 2(1), pp.173-189, https://doi.org/10.3390/tourhosp2010010.

Taecharungroj, V. (2016) City ambassadorship and citizenship behaviours: Modelling resident behaviours that help cities grow, Journal of Place Management and Development, 9(3), pp. 331–350.

Terriquez, V. (2015) Training Young Activists: Grassroots Organizing and Youths’ Civic and Political Trajectories, Sociological Perspectives, 58(2), pp. 223-242, doi:10.1177/0731121414556473.

Wu, W.-N. & Jung K. (2016) A missing link between citizen participation, satisfaction, and public performance: evidences from the city and county of San Francisco, International Journal of Public Sector Performance Management, 2(4), pp. 392-410, https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPSPM.2016.079720.

San Eugenio Vel, J., Ginesta, X. & Kavaratzis, M. (2020) The critical role of stakeholder engagement in a place branding strategy: a case study of the Empordà brand, European Planning Studies, 28(7), pp. 1393-1412.

Xu, H. & Zhu, W. (2020) Evaluating the impact mechanism of citizen participation on citizen satisfaction in a smart city, Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808320980746

Zenker, S. & Rutter, N. (2014) Is satisfaction the key? The role of citizen satisfaction, place attachment and place brand attitude on positive citizenship behavior, Cities, 38, pp. 11–17, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2013.12.009.

Zenker, S. & Erfgen, C. (2014) Let them do the work: a participatory place branding approach, Journal of Place Management and Development, 7(3), pp. 225-234, https://doi.org/10.1108/JPMD-06-2013-0016.

Published

2022-01-23

Issue

Section

Article