Efficiency and Corruption in Local Counties: Evidence from Romania

  • Ionel Bostan “Stefan cel Mare” University, Doctoral School of Economics
  • Mihaela Onofrei Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration
  • Cristian Popescu Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration
  • Dan Lupu Alexandru Ioan Cuza, University of Iasi, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration
  • Bogdan Firtescu Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration
Keywords: local municipalities, efficiency, corruption, DEA, Romania

Abstract

The current financial crisis and the lack of resources made imperative the analysis of the efficiency for managing public money, both at the central and at the local level. The general objective of the research is constituted by the estimate of the technical efficiency of all counties in Romania, as well as the analysis of its implications in local development. The originality and novelty of the study are supported by the research of a subject that has in the center the efficiency of the public authorities, current research direction for the public sector, in view of achieving a complex study. In order to reach the objective proposed, we will perform calculations on the basis of the Data Envelopment Analysis mathematical model and of the Tobit non-linear econometric model. At the same time, we reach the conclusion that in Romania, as in other states, there is a causality link between the efficiency of the local authorities and the level of corruption.

References

Afonso, A. & Fernandes, S. (2008) Assessing and explaining the relative efficiency of local government, The Journal of Socio-Economics, 37(5), pp. 1946-1979, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2007.03.007.

Afonso, A., Schuknecht, L. & Tanzi, V. (2010) Public sector efficiency: evidence for new EU member states and emerging markets, Applied Economics, 42(17), pp. 2147-2164, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00036840701765460.

Alcaide-Muñoz, L. & Rodríguez Bolívar, M. (2015) Determining Factors of Transparency and Accountability in Local Governments: A Meta-Analytic Study, Lex Localis - Journal of Local Self-Government, 13(2), pp. 129-160, https://doi.org/10.4335/13.2.129-160.

Ananiev, J. & Poposka, Z. (2014) Participation and Anti-Discrimination Based Local Strategic Documents – Case of Macedonian Municipalities, Lex Localis - Journal of Local Self-Government, 12(3), pp. 575-590, https://doi.org/10.4335/12.3.575-590.

Balaguer-Coll, T. M. & Prior, D. (2009) Short-and long-term evaluation of efficiency and quality. An application to Spanish municipalities, Applied Economics, 41(23), pp. 2991-3002, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00036840701351923.

Banker, R. D., Charnes, A. & Cooper, W. W. (1984) Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis, Management science, 30(9), pp. 1078-1092, https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.30.9.1078.

Benito, B., Bastida, F. & García, J. A. (2010) Explaining differences in efficiency: an application to Spanish municipalities, Applied economics, 42(4), pp. 515-528, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00036840701675560.

Boetti, L., Piacenza, M., & Turati, G. (2012) Decentralization and local governments' performance: how does fiscal autonomy affect spending efficiency? FinanzArchiv: Public Finance Analysis, 68(3), pp. 269-302, https://doi.org/10.1628/001522112X653840.

Bull, M. & Newell, J. (eds.) (2002) Corruption in contemporary politics (Berlin: Springer).

Castro, M. F., Guccio, C. & Rizzo, I. (2014) An assessment of the waste effects of corruption on infrastructure provision, International Tax and Public Finance, 21(4), pp. 813-843, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-014-9312-5.

Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W. & Rhodes, E. (1978) Measuring the efficiency of decision making units, European journal of operational research, 2(6), pp. 429-444, https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8.

Coelli, T. J., Rao, D. S. P., O’Donnell, C. J. & Battese, G. E. (2005) An introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis (Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media).

COM (2014) Report from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament, EU Anti-Corruption Report. Brussels, 38 final, avlailable at: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/home-affairs/e-library/documents/policies/organized-crime-and-human-trafficking/corruption/docs/acr_2014_en.pdf

De Borger, B. & Kerstens, K. (1996) Cost efficiency of Belgian local governments: A comparative analysis of FDH, DEA, and econometric approaches, Regional science and urban economics 26(2), pp. 145-170, https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-0462(95)02127-2.

Geys, B. & Moesen, W. (2009) Measuring local government technical (in) efficiency: an application and comparison of FDH, DEA, and econometric approaches, Public Performance & Management Review 32(4), pp. 499-513, https://doi.org/10.2753/PMR1530-9576320401(2017).

Jimenez, F., Villoria, M., & García Quesada, M., (2012) Badly designed institutions, informal rules and perverse incentives: Local government corruption in Spain, Lex localis – Journal of Local Self-Government, 10(4), pp.363-372, https://doi.org/10.4335/10.4.363-381(2012).

Kalb, A. (2010) The impact of intergovernmental grants on cost efficiency: theory and evidence from German municipalities, Economic Analysis and Policy, 40(1), pp.23-48, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0313-5926(10)50002-X.

Loikkanen, H. A. & Susiluoto, I. (2005) Cost Efficiency of Finnish Municipalities in Basic Service Provision 1994-2002, Urban Public Economics Review, 4, pp. 39-64.

Navot, D., & Beeri, I., (2017) Conceptualization of Political Corruption, Perceptions of Corruption, and Political Participation in Democracies, Lex Localis – Journal of Local Self-Government, 15(2), pp. 199-2012, https://doi.org/10.4335/15.2.199-219(2017)

Pevcin, P. (2014) Efficiency levels of sub-national governments: a comparison of SFA and DEA estimations, The TQM Journal, 26(3), pp.275-283, https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-12-2013-0127.

Pollanen, R. M. (2005) Performance measurement in municipalities: Empirical evidence in Canadian context, International Journal of Public Sector Management, 18(1), pp. 4-24, https://doi.org/10.1108/09513550510576125.

Radu, L. & Gulyas, G. (2010) Corupția în România, o problemă de nerezolvat?, Revista Transilvană de Ştiinţe Administrative, 12(26), pp. 107-124, http://rtsa.ro/rtsa/index.php/rtsa/article/view/92/88.

De Sousa Da Conceição Sampaio, M. & Stošić, B. (2005) Technical efficiency of the Brazilian municipalities: correcting nonparametric frontier measurements for outliers, Journal of Productivity analysis, 24(2), pp. 157-181, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-005-4702-4.

Simar, L. & Wilson, P. W. (2007) Estimation and inference in two-stage, semi-parametric models of production processes, Journal of econometrics, 136(1), pp. 31-64, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2005.07.009.

Skrbec, J. & Dobovsek, B. (2013) Corruption capture of local self-governments in Slovenia, Lex Localis – Journal , 11(3), pp. 615-621, https://doi.org/10.4335/11.3.615-630(2013).

Smilov, D. & Toplak, J. (eds.) (2008) Political Finance and Corruption in Eastern Europe the Transition Period (New York: Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.).

Stastna, L. & Martin G. (2011) Local government efficiency: Evidence from the Czech municipalities, IES Working Paper, 14, pp. 1-71, available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1978730.

Tracy, T. (2010) Corruption and Development: The Anti‐Corruption Campaigns, Journal of International Development 22(1), pp. 150-151, doi: 10.1002/jid.1531.

Vilela, N. B., Gomes, J. C., & Morais, P. (2017) Government Transparency: Reality or Mirage?, Lex localis - Journal of Local Self-Government 15(3), pp. 725-736.

Published
2018-03-27
Section
Articles