Principles or Rules-based Regulation in the Face of Uncertainty – Does it Really Matter?

  • Mirko Pečarič University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Administration
Keywords: regulation, complexity, principle-based approach, evaluation elements, weights

Abstract

The public administrations prepare draft laws. New things always emerge that cannot be in advance framed in laws. One solution could be the principle-based approach on the local and national level that gives the most relevant principles-rules combinations in the face of complexity. The paper presents the ability to measure principles and rules: it establishes the “1:47 rule” or ratio between the principles and rules, and gives a model that embraces the principles-rules evaluation elements and their weights. By this method, decision-makers and norms' addresses could achieve decisions without the need for more and more detailed, but ineffective regulations.

Author Biography

Mirko Pečarič, University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Administration

Associate Professor

References

Aristotle. (2004) Nicomachean Ethics (R. Crisp, Ed.) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Baldwin, R., Cave, M., & Lodge, M. (2012) The Oxford Handbook of Regulation (Reprint edition) (Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press).
Baldwin, R., Cave, M., & Lodge, M. (2013) Understanding Regulation: Theory, Strategy, and Practice (2 edition) (New York: Oxford University Press).
Braithwaite, J. (2002) Rules and Principles: A Theory of Legal Certainty, Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy, 27, pp. 47-82.
Breyer, S. (1982) Regulation and Its Reform (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press).
Craig, P. (2012) EU Administrative Law (Oxford: OUP).
Dennet, D. C. (2012) Pojasnjena zavest (Ljubljana: Krtina).
Douglas, M. (1986) How Institutions Think (Syracuse, N.Y.: Syracuse University Press).
Douglas, M. (1994) Risk and Blame: Essays in Cultural Theory (London; New York: Routledge).
Dworkin, R. (1978) Taking Rights Seriously (Fifth Printing edition) (Cambridge: Harvard University Press).
Ehrlich, I., & Posner, R. A. (1974) An Economic Analysis of Legal Rulemaking. The Journal of Legal Studies, 3(1), pp. 257–286.
Guggenheimer, H. W. (2008) Tractates Bava Qamma, Bava Mesi’a, and Bava Batra (Berlin; New York: Walter de Gruyter).
Hacking, I. (2001) An Introduction to Probability and Inductive Logic (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Hood, C., Rothstein, H., & Baldwin, R. (2001) The Government of Risk: Understanding Risk Regulation Regimes (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Howard, R. A., & Abbas, A. E. (2015) Foundations of Decision Analysis (Boston: Pearson).
Nehl, H. P. (1999) Principles of Administrative Procedure in EC Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing).
Nieto-Garrido, E., & Delgado, I. M. (2007) European Administrative Law in the Constitutional Treaty (Oxford and Portland: Hart Publishing).
O’Keeffe, D. & Bavasso, A. (2000) Judicial Review in European Union Law:Essays in Honour of Lord Slynn (The Hague: Kluwer Law International).
Parisi, F., & Fon, V. (2008) The Economics of Lawmaking (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Pinker, S. (1997). How the Mind Works (London: Penguin Books).
Posner, E. A. (1996) Law, Economics, and Inefficient Norms, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 144(5), pp. 1697–1744.
Posner, E. A. (2009) Law and Social Norms (Cambridge: Harvard University Press).
Raiffa, H. (1994) The Prescriptive Orientation of Decision Making: A Synthesis of Decision Analysis, Behavioral Decision Making, and Game Theory, In: Ríos, S. (ed.) Decision Theory and Decision Analysis: Trends and Challenges (pp. 3–13) (Boston: Springer Science & Business Media).
Raitio, J. (2003) The Principle of Legal Certainty in EC Law (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers).
Sally, D. (1995) Conversation and Cooperation in Social Dilemmas A Meta-Analysis of Experiments from 1958 to 1992, Rationality and Society, 7(1), pp. 58–92.
Schoemaker, P. J. H., & Russo, E. J. (1994) A Pyramid of Decision Approaches, In: Ríos, S. (ed.) Decision Theory and Decision Analysis: Trends and Challenges (Boston: Springer Science & Business Media), pp. 53-78.
Schwartz, A. & Scott, R. (1995) The Political Economy of Private Legislatures, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 143, pp. 595–654.
Schwarze, J. (2013) Sources of European Administrative Law, In: Martin, S. (ed.) The Construction of Europe: Essays in Honour of Emile Noël (Dordrecht: Springer Science & Business Media).
Simon, H. A. (1997) Administrative Behavior, 4th Edition (4 Sub edition) (New York: Free Press).
Slovic, P. (1987) Perception of Risk, Science, 236(4799), pp. 280–285.
Taleb, N. N. (2010) The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable Fragility (New York: Random House Publishing Group).
Taleb, N. N., & Sandis, C. (2014) The Skin In The Game Heuristic for Protection Against Tail Events, Review of Behavioral Economics, (1), pp. 1–21.
Wilson, W. (1887) The Study of Administration. Political Science Quarterly, 2(2), pp. 197–222. doi: 10.2307/2139277.
Xenitidou, M. & Edmonds, B. (eds.) (2014) The Complexity of Social Norms (Heidelberg; New York: Springer).
Published
2017-06-28
Section
Articles