Why Can't We Supervise What Central Banks are Doing in Our Name? Troubling Gaps in State Auditing of Central Banks in Eurozone
Article presents the attempts of Central banks in Europe to avoid comprehensive supervision over the regularity and performance of their operations by referring to their independence. Even though the effectiveness of operations of central banks in Europe significant influences public finance standings and economic situation in general, there is no efficient control established over the central banks in Europe. National central banks (NCB) in Eurozone are reluctant to account to Supreme Audit Institutions (SAI) since they endeavour to achieve the legal prohibition of audit of their operations respectively they are willing to agree only to significantly limited audit scope of (less important) parts of their operations. The final decisions are in hands of national parliaments that are – without prejudice to the competence of the EU institutions – independent in determining the scope of audit by the national SAIs over the national central banks.
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BIS) (2014) External audits of banks, Bank for international settlements (Basel: Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BIS)), available at: www.bis.org/publ/bcbs244.pdf (November 24, 2016).
Bingham, T. R. G. (2001) Central bank accountability, Written evidence for the UK House of Commons Treasury Committee (London: UK House of Commons).
Eijffinger, S. C. W. & Hoeberichts, M. H. (2000) Central Bank Accountability and Transparency: Theory and Some Evidence (Frankfurt am Main: Economic Research Centre of the Deutsche Bundesbank)
European Commission (2009) Economic Crisis in Europe: Causes, Consequences and Responses, European Economy 7/2009, Directorate General – Economic and Financial Affairs (Luxembourg: European Commission), available at: http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/publications/pages/publication15887_en.pdf (November 28, 2016).
European Court of Auditors (2014) European banking supervision taking shape — EBA and its changing context, European court of auditors special report (Luxembourg: European court of auditors).
European Court of Auditors (2014a) Gaps, overlaps and challenges: a landscape review of EU accountability and public audit arrangements, European court of auditors landscape review (Luxembourg: European court of auditors).
European Court of Auditors (2016) Single Supervisory Mechanism - Good start but further improvements needed, European court of auditors special report (Luxembourg: European court of auditors).
European Central Bank (2016) ECB opinion of 18 April 2016 on the auditing of Banka Slovenije’s business operations (CON/2016/24) (Fankfurt am Main: European Central Bank), available at: https://www.ecb.europa.eu/ecb/legal/pdf/sl_con_2016_24_f_sign.pdf (November 22, 2016).
European Central Bank (2016) ECB opinion of 13 December 2016 on the auditing of Banka Slovenije’s business operations (CON/2016/59) (Fankfurt am Main: European Central Bank), available at: https://www.ecb.europa.eu/ecb/legal/pdf/en_con_2016_59__si_f_signed.pdf (November 22, 2016).
European Central Bank (2016) ECB opinion of 15 June 2016 on amendments to the Law on Hrvatska Narodna Banka (CON/2016/33) (Fankfurt am Main: European Central Bank), https://www.ecb.europa.eu/ecb/legal/pdf/en_con_2016_33_f_sign.pdf (November 22, 2016).
Nagy, S. (2012) The role of Supreme Audit Institutions in fight against the consequences of financial end economic crisis: A theoretical approach, Crisis Aftermath: Economic Policy changes in the EU and its Member States, 8th-9th March, 2012, University of Szeged, Hungary, availalbe at: www.eco.u-szeged.hu/download.php?docID=40606 (November 28, 2016).
OECD (1998) Central Bank Audit Practices, (Paris: OECD), available at: http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/central-bank-audit-practices_5kml611wf826.pdf?contentType=%2fns%2fWorkingPaper&itemId=%2fcontent%2fworkingpaper%2f5kml611wf826-en&mimeType=application%2fpdf&containerItemId=%2fcontent%2fworkingpaperseries%2f20786581&accessItemIds=&option6=imprint&value6=http%3a%2f%2foecd.metastore.ingenta.com%2fcontent%2fimprint%2foecd (November 24, 2016).
It is a condition that the authors assign copyright or license the publication rights in their articles, including abstracts, to Institute for Local Self-Government Maribor. This enables us to ensure full copyright protection and to disseminate the article, and of course Journal, to the widest possible readership in print and electronic formats as appropriate. Authors retain many rights under the Institutes' right policies, which can be found at journal.lex-localis.press. Authors are themselves responsible for obtaining permission to reproduce copyright material from other sources.