The Approach of the Local System of Child Protection from a Social-Network Aspect and its Options of Interpretation – A Case Study

  • Imre Bertalan Mayor’s Office of Hajdúböszörmény
Keywords: local child protection system, centralization, interpersonal relations, formal and informal networks, social resources, sociometry of public services


Present study focus on the local system of child protection. It undertakes to provide a detailed picture of the structure of the system but in the same time paying special attention to interpersonal relations and the work through interpersonal nexuses. According to our hypotesis a deep, informal network lies between the authorities and institutions. Present study also involves the dimension of social connections in the interpretation. We hypothesize that centralization tendencies are not affecting the local system of child protection significantly because it is a dinamic system with an operation based on the relations of individuals and professionals.


Aronson, E. (2008) The Social Being (Budapest: Közgazdasági és Jogi Könyvkiadó)
Baldwin, R. (1995) Rules and Government (Oxford: Clarendon Press).
Coleman, J. S. (1990) Foundations of Social Theory (Cambridge, M.A.: Harvard University Press).
Ehleiter, J. (2007) The Theory and Practice of Settlement Control (Budapest: HVG-ORAC Lap és Könyvkiadó Kft.).
Ehmann, B. (2002) Deep in the Text – The Psychological Content Analysis (Budapest: Új Mandátum Kiadó).
Ericsson, K. (2000) Social Control and Emancipation? Ambiguities in Child Welfare, Journal of Scandinavian Studies in Criminology and Crime Prevention, 1(1), pp. 16-26, doi: 10.1080/14043850050116237.
Ferguson, H. (2004) Protecting Children in Time: Child Abuse, Child Protection and the Consequences of Modernity (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).
Gordon, T. & Noel, B. (2016) Human Relations (Budapest: Assertiv Kiadó).
Horváth M., T. (2013) Aspects for Analysis of the Regulatory Changes in Local Public Services In: Horváth M., T. (ed.) Swings. Changes in Public Service Delivery (Budapest: Dialóg Campus) pp. 9–25.
Houston, S. & Griffiths, H. (2000) Reflections on risk in child protection: is it time for a shift in paradigm?, Child & Family Social Work, 5(1) pp. 1-10, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2206.2000.00145.x.
Krippendorf, K. (1999) Content Analysis, In: Sallay, H. (ed.) Collection of Methodological Texts (Debrecen: Kossuth Egyetemi Kiadó) pp. 105-153.
Krippendorf, K. (2013) Content Analysis – An Introduction to Its Methodolgy (Sage Publications, Inc.).
Mérei, F. (2006) The Hidden Network of Communities – The Sociometric Interpretation (Budapest: Osiris Kiadó).
Munro, E. (1999) Common Errors of Reasoning in Child Protection Work, Child Abuse & Neglect, 8(23), pp.745–758.
Parton, N. (1998) Risk, Advanced Liberalism and Child Welfare: The Need to Rediscover Uncertainty and Ambiguity?, The British Journal of Social Work, 28(1) pp. 5-27, doi: 10.1093/ oxfordjournals.bjsw.a011317.
Péteri, G. (2000) Alternative Service Management, In: Nemec, J. & Wright, G. (ed.): Communal Finance. Theory and Practice in the Central European Transition (Budapest: Aula) pp. 434–465.
Roeders, P. & Gefferth, É. (2007) The secret of effective learning – The dynamics of effective teaching and learning (Budapest: Trefort Kiadó).
Szöllősi, G. (2003) The Problem of Child Protection as a Social Construction, Chance, 14(2), pp. 75–95.
Varju, M. (2002) The Disciple of Regulation – Introduction to the Study of Regulatory State (Debrecen: University notes, University of Debrecen, Faculty of Law).
Wilson, K. & James, A. (2007) The Child Protection Handbook (London: Elsevier Limited).