The Effects of Decentralization on Efficiency in Public Procurement: Empirical Evidence for the Czech Republic

  • Michal Plaček Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Social Sciences, Centre for Social and Economic Strategies
Keywords: public procurement, efficiency, decentralization, Czech republic

Abstract

The impact of decentralization on efficiency in the production of public goods and services has been described by the current scientific discourse in some detail. In this article, we focus on an analysis of the impact of the factor of decentralization as well as other selected factors on efficiency in public procurement. We view the term efficiency to be the ratio between the tendered and the estimated price, but also as procedural correctness and legality, as it is reflected in the administration of complaints, investigations, and findings regarding violations of the law by the supervising authority. We then describe the phases of bidding and post-bidding. For empirical research, we used linear regression and logistic regression. These methods are applied to data regarding public procurement for the years 2010-2014. The results show that, among the contracting authorities at the different levels of decentralization, there were statistically significant differences which we can explain through the different levels of accountability, economies of scale, as well as the qualifications of the workers of the contracting authority.

References

Albano, L. G., Spagnol &, C., Zanza, M. (2009). Regulating joint bidding in public procurement, Journal of competition law and economics, 5(2), pp. 335-360.
Spagnolo, C, Albano, G. L. & Bianchi, M.,(2007) Bid average methods in procurement. in Rivista di Politica Economica, No. I - II 2006, In: Piga, G. & Thai, K. V. (eds.) The Economics of Public Procurement (London, Palgrave-Mcmillan), pp. 41-64.
Ames, B., (1994) The reverse coattails effect: Local party organization in the 1989 Brazilian presidential election, American Political Science Review, 88(1), pp.95-111.
Baldwin, R. & Wyplosz, Ch. (2004) The Economics of European Integration (Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill).
Bakoš, E, Soukopová, J. & Selešovský, J. (2015) The Historical Roots of Local Self-Government in Czech and Slovak Republics, Lex Localis – Journal of Local Self-Government, 13(1), pp. 1-19.
Bardhan, P. & Mookherjee, D. (2006) Decentralisation and accountability in infrastructure delivery in developing countries, Economic journal, 116(508), pp. 101-127, doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2006.01049.x.
Barenstein, M. & de Mello, L. (2001) Fiscal decentralization and governance: A cross-country analysis. IMF Working Papers 01/71 (Washington D.C.: International Monetary Fund).
Brezovnik, B., Oplotnik, Ž. J. & Vojinovič, B., (2015) (De)centralization of public procurement at the local level in the EU, Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 2015(46E), pp. 37-52.
Czech Statistical Office (2013) The size structure of municipalities in the Czech Republic and their population size until 31 December 2011 (Prague: Czech Statistical Office).
Czech Statistical Office (2014) Basic information about the regions in the Czech Republic (Prague: Czech Statistical Office).
Dametri, R. P. (2012) Centralization vs Decentralization of Purchasing in the Public Sector: The Role of e- Procurement in the Italian Case, In: Khachidze, V. (ed.) iCETS 2012 (Heidelberg: Springer), pp. 457-470.
De Mello, L. R. (2000) Fiscal decentralization and intergovernmental fiscal relations: A cross-country analysis, World development, 28(2), pp. 365-380, doi: 10.1016/S0305-750X(99)00123-0.
Enikolopov, R. & Zhuravskaya, E. (2007) Decentralization and political institutions, Journal of Public Economics, 91(11-12), pp. 2261-2290.
EC (2014) Public Procurement Indicators 2012 (Brussels: European Commission).
Eurostat (2015) Government finance statistics (Luxembourg: Eurostat).
Finžgar, M. & Oplotnik, Ž. J. (2013)Comparison of fiscal decentralization systems in EU-27 according to selected criteria, Lex Localis – Journal of Local Self-Government, 11(3), pp. 651-672
Fisman, R. & Gatti, R. (2002) Decentralization and corruption: evidence across countries, Journal of Public Economics, 83, pp. 325–345.
Freille, S. (2009) Federalism, decentralization and corruption (Munich: MPRA).
Freille, S., Hague, E. M. & Kneller, A. R., (2007) Federalism, Decentralization and Corruption. MPRA Paper, No. 27535 (Munich: MPRA).
Geys, B., Heinemann, F. & Kalb, A . (2010) Voter involvement, fiscal autonomy and public sector efficiency: Evidence from German municipalities, European journal of political economy, 26(2), pp. 265-278, doi: 10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2009.11.002.
Goldsmith, A. A. (1999) Slapping the grasping hand: Correlates of political corruption in emerging markets, American Journal of Economics and Sociology,58(3).pp.866–883.
Halaskova, M., (2015) Procuring Public Services and the Role of Territorial Self-Governments, In: Klimova, V. & Zitek, V. (ed) (2015) Proceedings of the 18th International Colloquium on Regional Sciences (Brno: Masaryk University), pp. 367-374.
Horňáková, M. & Špaček, D. (2013) Financial Management in Practice of Czech Regions – Background Points, Experiences and Issues, In: Špalková, D. & Matějová, L. (eds) (2013) Proceedings of the 17th International Conference Current Trends in Public Sector Research (Brno: Masaryk University, Faculty of Economics and Administration), pp. 237 – 245.
Jaško, O., Jovanović, P. & Čudanov, M. (2015) Cost efficiency in public procurement at local level: chances for improvement of local self – government and public enterprise in Serbia, Lex Localis- Journal of local selfgovernment, 13(3), pp. 789-807.
Jovanović, P. & Benković, S. (2012) Improvements in Organizing Public Procurement at the Local Self-Government Level in Serbia, Management, 64, pp. 25-32.
Jovanović, P., Joksimović, N. Ž. & Milosavljević, M. (2013) The Efficiency of Public Procurement Centralization: Empirical Evidence from Serbian Local Self- governments, Lex Localis – Journal of local selfgovernment, 11(4), pp. 883-899.
Jurčík, R. (2015) New Trends in the Evaluation of Public Contracts. The Lowest Tender Price or Economic Advantageousness of the Tender? In: Špalková, D. & Matějová, L. (eds.) (2015) Current Trends in Public Sector Research. Proceedings of the 19th International Conference (Brno: Masaryk University), pp. 125 – 134.
Jurčík, R. (2013) Komparace ekonomických a právních aspektů slovenské a české právní úpravy veřejných zakázek a připravované změny v oblasti veřejných zakázek v Evropské unii, Ekonomický časopis/Journal of Economics, 61(10), pp. 1091 – 1093.
Klibanoff, P. & Morduch, J. (1995) Decentralization, externalities, and efficiency, Review of economic studies, 62(2), pp. 223-247, doi: 10.2307/2297803.
Lockwood, B . (2002) Distributive politics and the costs of centralization, Review of economic studies, 69(2), pp. 313-337, doi: 10.1111/1467-937X.00207.
Mascolel, A. (1980) Efficiency and decentralization in the pure theory of public-goods, Quarterly journal of economics, 94(4), pp: 625-641, doi: 10.2307/1885661.
Matějová, L., Plaček, M., Křápek,M., Půček, M. & Ochrana, F. (2014) Economies of scale – empirical evidence from the Czech Republic, Procedia Economics and Finance, 12, pp. 403–411.
Nemec, J., Šumpíková, M., Klazar, K. & Grega, M., (2014) Efficiency versus economy in public procurement, In: Löster T. & Pavelka T. (eds.) Conference Proceedings: The 8th International Days of Statistics and Economics. 1. vyd. (Praha: Melandrium), pp.1054-1063.
Nemec, J. & Grega, M. (2015) Factors Influencing Final Price of Public Procurement: evidence from Slovakia, Procedia Economics and Finance, 25, pp. 543-551, doi:10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00768-6.
Oates, W. E. (1978) Decentralization, Bureaucracy, and Government: Discussion, American Economic Review, 68(2), pp. 262-263.
OECD (2000) Centralised and Decentralised Public Procurement. Sigma Papers, 2000, no. 29 (Paris: OECD Publishing).
OECD (2007) Central Public Procurement Structures and Capacity in Member States of the European Union. Sigma paper, 2007, no. 40 (Paris: OECD Publishing).
OECD (2011) Centralize purchasing systems in the European Union. Sigma Papers, 2011, no. 47 (Paris, OECD Publishing).
Ochrana, F. & Pavel, J. (2013) Analysis of the Impact of Transparency, Corruption, Openness in Competition and Tender Procedures on Public Procurement in the Czech Republic, Central European Journal of Public Policy, 7(2), pp. 114 – 135.
Pavel, J. & Sičáková-Beblavá, E. (2012) Postkontraktační chování veřejných zadavatelů na Slovensku, Politická ekonomie, 60(5), pp. 635 – 648.
Pavel, J. (2014) Factors Affecting the Value of Compliance Costs of Public Procurement, In: Sedmihradská, L. (ed.): Theoretical and Practical Aspects of Public Finance 2014. Proceeding of the 19th International Conference (Praha: Wolters Kluwer), pp. 222 – 227.
Pegnato, A. J. (2003) Assessing federal procurement reform: Has the procurement pendulum stopped swinging?, Journal of public procurement, 3(2), pp. 145-175.
Plaček, M., Schmidt, M., Ochrana, F. & Půček, M., (2016) Impact of decentralization on the efficiency of public procurement (the case of Czech republic), In: Špalková, D. & Matějová, L. (eds.) Proceedings of the 20th International Conference Current Trends in Public Sector Research 2016 (Brno: Masaryk University), pp.68-76.
Plaček, M., Matějová, L., Křápek, M., Půček, M. & Ochrana, F. (2014) Decentralization vs economies of scale: expenditure on maintenance of municipalities’ property, In: Sedmihradská, L. (ed.) Proceedings of the 19th International Conference: Theoretical and Practical Aspects of Public Finance 2014. 1. vyd. (Praha: Wolters Kluwer), pp. 228-236.
Prudhomme, R. (1995) The Dangers of Decentralization, World Bank Research Observer, 1995, 10(2), pp. 201-220.
Simon, H. (1997) Administrative Behavior: a Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organization (New York: Macmillan Company).
Soudek, J. & Skuhrovec, J. (2013) Public Procurement of Homogeneous Goods: the Czech Republic Case Study. IES Working Paper 05/2013 (Prague: IES FSV. Charles University).
Soukopová, J., Nemec, J., Matějová, L. & Struk, M. (2014) Municipality Size and Local Public Services - Do Economies of Scale Exist?, NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 7(2), pp. 151-171, doi:10.2478/nispa-2014-0007.
Svidroňová, M. & Vaceková, G. (2012) Current state of self-financing of private non profit organizations in the conditions of the Slovak republic, Technological and economic development economy, 18(3).pp. 438-451.
Treisman, D. (2000) The causes of corruption: A cross-national study, Journal of Public Economics, 76(3), pp.399–457.
Wu, X. (2005) Corporate governance and corruption, Governance: An International Journal of Policy, 18(2), pp.151–170.
zIndex (2013) Results (Prague: EconLab z.s), available at: http://www.zindex.cz/ (December 23, 2016).
Published
2017-01-31
Section
Articles