Incumbency Advantage in the Context of Electoral Manipulation. Experiences of Local Elections in Poland

  • Agnieszka Turska-Kawa University of Silesia, Institute of Political Science
  • Weldemar Wojastik University of Silesia, Institute of Political Science
Keywords: electoral manipulation, local elections, incumbency advantage, electoral competition, Poland

Abstract

The paper analyzes the potential impact of individuals exercising their mandate and running for re-election (incumbents) on the instrumentalization of the electoral competition. The context chosen for this analysis is provided by local elections and by mechanisms used by politicians to improve their electoral chances. As in other types of elections, the personal dimension of manipulation in local elections is asymmetrical in its nature. Due to their position and resources held, incumbents are the ones who have a higher manipulative potential than their challengers. The aim of the paper is to analyze the advantage of incumbents in local elections by indicating the electoral manipulations used with regard to three basic types: institutional, communicative, and psychological. The analysis is conducted on the basis of Polish electoral experience and illustrated with examples justifying the importance of the individual manipulations in the electoral competition.

References

Alvarez, R. M., Hall, T. E. & Hyde, S. D. (2009) Election Fraud: Detecting and Deterring Electoral Manipulation (Washington D.C.: Brookings Institution Press).

Ansolabehere, S. & Snyder, J. M. (2002) The Incumbency Advantage in U.S. Elections: An Analysis of State and Federal Offices, 1942–2000, Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy, 1(3), pp. 315–338, https://doi.org/10.1089/153312902760137578.

Ansolabehere, S. & Snyder, J. M. (2004) Using Term Limits to Estimate Incumbency Advantages When Officeholders Retire Strategically, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 29(4), pp. 487-515, https://doi.org/10.3162/036298004X201276.

Ariga, K. (2015) Incumbency Disadvantage under Electoral Rules with Intraparty Competition: Evidence from Japan, The Journal of Politics, 77(3), pp. 874–887, https://doi.org/10.1086/681718.

Avis, E., Ferraz, C., Finan, F. & Varjão, C. (2017) Money and Politics: The Effects of Campaign Spending Limits on Political Competition and Incumbency Advantage (Working Paper Nr 23508), National Bureau of Economic Research, https://doi.org/10.3386/w23508.

Bartnicki, S. (2015) Wpływ liczby kadencji nieprzerwanego piastowania lokalnej władzy wykonawczej wyłanianej w wyborach bezpośrednich na wybrane cechy gmin, Acta Politica Polonica, 33, pp. 58–75.

Benoit, K. & Marsh, M. (2008) The Campaign Value of Incumbency: A New Solution to the Puzzle of Less Effective Incumbent Spending, American Journal of Political Science, 52(4), pp. 874–890, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00348.x.

Bernhardt, M. D. & Ingerman, D. E. (1985) Candidate reputations and the ‘incumbency effect’, Journal of Public Economics, 27(1), pp. 47–67, https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(85)90028-3.

Berry, W. D., Berkman, M. B. & Schneiderman, S. (2000) Legislative Professionalism and Incumbent Reelection: The Development of Institutional Boundaries, American Political Science Review, 94(4), pp. 859–874, https://doi.org/10.2307/2586212.

Biezen, I. van. (2003) Financing Political Parties and Election Campaigns: Guidelines (Strasbourg: Council of Europe).

Birch, S. (2007) Electoral Systems and Electoral Misconduct, Comparative Political Studies, 40(12), pp. 1533–1556, https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414006292886.

Bishop, S. & Hoeffler, A. (2016) Free and fair elections: A new database, Journal of Peace Research, 53(4), pp. 608–616, https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343316642508.

Bitner, M. (2018) Finansowanie kampanii wyborczej do organów jednostek samorządu terytorialnego, e-Politikon, 26, pp. 138–164.

Boon, J., Salomonsen, H. H., Verhoest, K. & Pedersen, M. Ø. (2019) Media and Bureaucratic Reputation: Exploring Media Biases in the Coverage of Public Agencies, In: Bach, W. T. & Wegrich, K. (eds) The Blind Spots of Public Bureaucracy and the Politics of Non‐Coordination (New York: Springer International Publishing), pp. 171-192, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76672-0_9.

Bornstein, R. (1989) Exposure and Affect: Overview and Meta-Analysis of Research, 1968–1987, Psychological Bulletin, 106(2), pp. 265–289.

Bracco, E., Porcelli, F. & Redoano, M. (2013) Incumbent Effects and Partisan Alignment in Local Elections: A Regression Discontinuity Analysis Using Italian Data (SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 2205610), Social Science Research Network, available at https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2205610 (June 12, 2020).

Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., & Zimbardo, P. G. (2002) When Parsimony Subdues Distinctiveness: Simplified Public Perceptions of Politicians’ Personality, Political Psychology, 23(1), pp. 77–95, https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00271.

Cialdini, R. B. (1993) Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion (New York: Morrow).

Cwalina, W. & Falkowski, A. (2006) Marketing polityczny: Perspektywa psychologiczna (Gdansk: Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne).

Dalbey, S. B. (2017) Celebrity Endorsements and Voting Intentions: The Role of Liking and Preference for Consistency (Long Beach, CA: Department of Communication Studies California State University), available at https://search.proquest.com/openview/882ef9c262dc82de3e197ee07050bf12/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y (June 20, 2020).

D’Angelo, P. (2018) Doing News Framing Analysis II: Empirical and Theoretical Perspectives (Abingdon-on Themes, UK: Routledge).

Eggers, A. C. & Spirling, A. (2015) The advantages and disadvantages of incumbency. Theory and Evidence from British Elections, 1832-2001, available at http://andy.egge.rs/papers/Eggers_Spirling_Incumbency_Effects_UK_201404.pdf (June 12, 2020).

Farrell, D. M. (1996) Campaign strategies and tactics, In: LeDuc, L., Niemi R. G. & Norris, P. (eds) Comparing democracies: Elections and voting in global perspective (London: Sage Publications).

Ferejohn, J. (1986) Incumbent Performance and Electoral Control, Public Choice, 50(1/3), pp. 5–25.

Fiva, J. H. & Røhr, H. L. (2018) Climbing the ranks: Incumbency effects in party-list systems, European Economic Review, 101, pp. 142–156, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2017.09.011.

Flis, J. (2018) Wybory samorządowe—Wzory zaangażowania (Warsaw: Fundacja im. Stefana Batorego), available at http://www.batory.org.pl/upload/files/Programy% 20operacyjne/Masz%20Glos/Jaroslaw%20Flis_Wybory%20samorzadowe.pdf (June 12, 2020).

Flis, J., Gendźwiłł, A. & Stolicki, D. (2018) Rywale włodarzy. Doświadczenia i szanse samorządowych pretendentów, e-Politikon, 26, pp. 33–64.

Frank, R. W. & Martínez i Coma, F. (2017) How election dynamics shape perceptions of electoral integrity, Electoral Studies, 48, pp. 153–165, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2017.05.007.

Gelman, A. & King, G. (1990) Estimating Incumbency Advantage Without Bias, American Journal of Political Science, 34(4), pp. 1142–1164.

Gendźwiłł, A., Żółtak, T. & Rutkowski, J. (2015) Niekonkurencyjne wybory, brakujący kandydaci. Dlaczego niektóre komitety wyborcze nie wystawiają kandydatów na burmistrzów?, Studia Regionalne i Lokalne, 4(62), pp. 64–79, https://doi.org/10.7366/1509499546204.

Goldstein, N., Martin, S. & Cialdini, R. B. (2017). Yes!: 60 secrets from the science of persuasion (London: Profile Books).

Goodwin-Gill, G. S. (2006) Free and Fair Elections (Geneve: Inter-Parliamentary Union).

Gorton, W. A. (2016) Manipulating Citizens: How Political Campaigns’ Use of Behavioral Social Science Harms Democracy, New Political Science, 38(1), 61–80, https://doi.org/10.1080/07393148.2015.1125119.

Ham, C. van. (2015) Getting elections right? Measuring electoral integrity. Democratization, 22(4), pp. 714–737, https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2013.877447.

Hart, W. & Gable, P. A. (2013) Motivating goal pursuit: The role of affect motivational intensity and activated goals, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(5), pp. 922–926, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.05.002.

Hartvigsen, D. (2008) The Manipulation of Voting Systems, Journal of Business Ethics, 80(1), pp. 13–21, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9438-9.

Henderson, J. A., Hamel, B. T. & Goldzimer, A. M. (2018) Gerrymandering Incumbency: Does Nonpartisan Redistricting Increase Electoral Competition?, The Journal of Politics, 80(3), pp. 1011–1016. https://doi.org/10.1086/697120.

Heywood, A. (2015) Key Concepts in Politics and International Relations (London: Macmillan International Higher Education).

Hodges, B. H. (2017) Conformity and divergence in interactions, groups, and culture, In: Harkins, S. G., Williams, K. D. & Burger, J. (eds) The Oxford handbook of social influence (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 87–105.

Ilicic, J. & Webster, C. M. (2014). Eclipsing: When Celebrities Overshadow the Brand. Psychology & Marketing, 31(11), pp. 1040–1050, https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20751.

Iyer, R., Graham, J., Koleva, S., Ditto, P. & Haidt, J. (2017) Beyond Identity Politics: Moral Psychology and the 2008 Democratic Primary, Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 10(1), pp.293–306, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-2415.2010.01203.x.

Kirkland, P. A. & Coppock, A. (2018) Candidate Choice Without Party Labels, Political Behavior, 40(3), pp. 571–591, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-017-9414-8.

Klašnja, M. (2016) Increasing rents and incumbency disadvantage, Journal of Theoretical Politics, 28(2), pp. 225–265, https://doi.org/10.1177/0951629815586873.

Klašnja, M. & Titiunik, R. (2017) The Incumbency Curse: Weak Parties, Term Limits, and Unfulfilled Accountability, American Political Science Review, 111(1), pp. 129–148, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055416000575.

Klinger, M. R. & Greenwald, A. G. (1994) Preferences need no inferences?: The cognitive basis of unconscious mere exposure effects, In: Kitayama, S. & Niedenthal, P. M. (eds) The heart’s eye: Emotional influences in perception and attention (Cambridge, MA: Academic Press), https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-410560-7.50010-7.

Krukowska, J. (2018) Staż burmistrza na stanowisku a jego poglądy na zarządzanie gminą. Samorząd Terytorialny, 7-8, pp. 24–38.

Kukovic, S. & Hacek, M. (2013) The Re-Election of Mayors in the Slovenian Local Self-Government, Lex Localis - Journal of Local Self-Government, 11(2), 87-99.

Kukovic, S. & Hacek, M. (2017) Continuity of leadership in Slovenian local government: Analysys of mayoral re-election, Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska, Sectio K – Politologia, 23(1), p. 97, https://doi.org/10.17951/k.2016.23.1.97.

Levine, L. J. & Pizarro, D. A. (2004) Emotion and Memory Research: A Grumpy Overview. Social Cognition, 22(5), pp. 530–554, https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.22.5.530.50767.

Levitsky, S. & Way, L. A. (2002) Elections Without Democracy: The Rise of Competitive Authoritarianism, Journal of Democracy, 13(2), pp. 51–65, https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2002.0026.

Lilleker, D. G. (2006) Key Concepts in Political Communication (Thousand Oaks: SAGE).

Marland, A. (1998) The Electoral Benefits and Limitations of Incumbency, Canadian Parliamentary Review, 21, pp. 33–36.

McQuestin, D. & Drew, J. (2018) The Price of Populism: The Association between Directly Elected Mayors and Unit Expenditure in Local Government, Lex Localis - Journal of Local Self-Government, 16(4), pp. 673-691.

Meirowitz, A. (2008) Electoral Contests, Incumbency Advantages, and Campaign Finance, The Journal of Politics, 70(3), pp. 681–699, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381608080699.

Morlino, L. (2009) Legitimacy and the quality of democracy, International Social Science Journal, 60(196), pp. 211–222, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2451.2010.01717.x.

Moser, R. G., Scheiner, E. & Stoll, H. (2018) Social Diversity, Electoral Systems, and the Party System, In: Herron, E. S., Pekkanen, R. J. & Shugart, M. S. (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Electoral Systems (Oxford: Oxford University Press), https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190258658.013.28.

Pasek, J. M. H. (2011) Communication Through Elections: Three Studies Exploring the Determinants of Citizen Behavior (Stanford: Stanford University).

Prior, M. (2006) The Incumbent in the Living Room: The Rise of Television and the Incumbency Advantage in U.S. House Elections, The Journal of Politics, 68(3), pp. 657–673, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00452.x.

Przeworski, A., Stokes, S. C. & Manin, B. (1999) Democracy, Accountability, and Representation (Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press).

Rokeach, M. (1973) The nature of human values (New York: Free Press).

Samples, J. (2008) The Fallacy of Campaign Finance Reform (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).

Schedler, A. (2002) The Menu of Manipulation, Journal of Democracy, 13(2), pp. 36–50, https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2002.0031.

Schedler, A. (2013) The Politics of Uncertainty: Sustaining and Subverting Electoral Authoritarianism (Oxford: Oxford University press).

Simpser, A. (2013a) Why Governments and Parties Manipulate Elections: Theory, Practice, and Implications (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

Simpser, A. (2013b) Why Governments and Parties Manipulate Elections: Theory, Practice, and Implications (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

Smirnov, O., & Fowler, J. H. (2007) Policy-Motivated Parties in Dynamic Political Competition, Journal of Theoretical Politics, 19(1), pp. 9–31.

Stewart, A. J., Mosleh, M., Diakonova, M., Arechar, A. A., Rand, D. G. & Plotkin, J. B. (2019) Information gerrymandering and undemocratic decisions, Nature, 573(7772), 117–121.

Trounstine, J. (2009) Political Monopolies in American Cities: The Rise and Fall of Bosses and Reformers (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).

Turska-Kawa, A. & Wojtasik, W. (2017) Diversity of Roman Catholics in Poland and Their Socio-Institutional Preferences, Religio, 25(1), pp. 43–67.

Turska-Kawa, A., & Wojtasik, W. (2018) Direct Democracy in Poland. Between Democratic Centralism and Civic Localism, Journal of Comparative Politics, 11(2), pp. 18–29.

Turska-Kawa, A., & Wojtasik, W. (2019) Perception of Images of Polish Presidents After 1989 in the Context of Democracy Consolidation Processes, Journal of Comparative Politics, 2(12), pp. 4–17.

Weiner, M. & Özbudun, E. (1987) Competitive Elections in Developing Countries (Durham: Duke University Press).

Westholm, A. (1997) Distance versus Direction: The Illusory Defeat of the Proximity Theory of Electoral Choice, American Political Science Review, 91(4), pp. 865–883, https://doi.org/10.2307/2952170.

Wojtasik, W. (2019) Electoral Manipulation via Media: Theory and Evidence, Communication Today, 10(2), pp. 28–40.

Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9(2), pp. 1–27, https://doi.org/10.1037/h0025848.

Zajonc, R. B. (1985) Uczucia a myślenie: Nie trzeba się domyślać, by wiedzieć, co się woli, Przegląd Psychologiczny, 1, pp. 27–72.

Żurek, R. (2012) Recepta na „długowieczność” wójta. Analiza czynników prowadzących do reelekcji w wyborach 2010 r. Na wybranych przykładach, Res Politicae, available at https://docplayer.pl/1620986-Res-politicae-wydanie-specjalne.html (June 12, 2020).

Published
2020-10-29
Section
Article