Fiscal Decentralisation and Provision of Local Public Services in Selected EU Countries
Fiscal decentralisation aims to provide own financial resources or transfers from the central government for an efficient use of the original competences by local governments. This paper deals with the role of fiscal decentralisation and its impact on local public services. Rational indicators of revenue and expenditure fiscal decentralisation and selected local government expenditure are compared by public services, including the extent of decentralisation in selected EU countries. Modelling and comparison of selected EU countries is carried out through the method of multidimensional scaling according to the similarity of local government expenditure on services of social protection, healthcare, education, and recreation and culture (as % GDP) in years 2006, 2009 and 2012.
Ahmad, E., Brosio, G. & Tanzi, V. (2008) Local Service Provision in Selected OECD Countries: Do Decentralized Operations Work Better? (Washington. CD: International Monetary Fund), doi: 10.5089/9781451869293.001.
Aristovnik, A. (2012) Fiscal Decentralization in Eastern Europe: Trends and selected Issues, Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 2012 (37/E), pp. 5-22, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2187475.
Beblavý, M. & Sičáková-Beblavá, E. (2007) Faktory ovplyvňujúce rozhodovanie o sposobe zabezpečovania služeb vo velkých slovenských mestách, Politická ekonomie, 55(2), pp. 245-262.
Blöchliger, H. & Vammalle, C. (2012) Reforming Fiscal Federalism and Local Government: Beyond the Zero-Sum Game, (OECD: Fiscal Federalism Studies, OECD Publishing), doi: 10.1787/9789264119970-en.
Boadway, R. & Shah, A. (2009) Fiscal Federalism: Principles and Practice of Multiorder Governance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511626883.
Borg, I., Groenen, P. J. F. & Mair, P. (2013) Applied Multidimensional Scaling (New York: Springer), doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-31848-1.
Breuss, F. & Eller, M. (2004) Fiscal Decentralisation and Economic Growth: Is There Really a Link? CESifo DICE Report, Journal for Institutional Comparisons, 2(1), pp. 3-9.
Brown, C. V. & Jackson, P. M. (1990) Public Sector Economics (United Kingdom: Wiley-Blackwell).
Brown, T. L. & Potoski, M. (2003) Transaction Costs and Institutional Explanations for Government Service Production Decisions, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13(4), pp. 441-468, doi: 10.1093/jpart/mug030.
Cemr (2013) Decentralisation at a Crossroads. Territorial Reforms in Europe in Times of Crisis (Brussels: Council of European Municipalities and Region).
Cemr (2012) Local and Regional Government in Europe. Structures and Competences (Brussels: Council of European Municipalities and Region).
Danko, L. & Bednář, P. (2013) Creative Industries and Creative Index: Towards Measuring the "Creative" Regional Performance, In Semmelrock-Picej, M. T. & Novak, A. (eds.) Proceedings of the The 9th European Conference on Management Leadership and Governance (Reading: Acad Conferences).
Dexia & Cemr (2012) Sub-national Public Finance in the European Union (Brussels: Dexia & Council of European Municipalities and Region).
Eurostat (2014) Statistic Database, Total General Government Expenditure (Luxembourg: Eurostat), avaliable at: http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/eurostat/
home/ (December 20, 2014).
Finžgar, M. & Oplotnik, Z. J. (2013) Comparison of Fiscal Decentralization Systems in EU-27 According to Selected Criteria, Lex Localis - Journal of Local Self-Government, 11 (3), pp. 651-72, doi: 10.4335/11.3.651-672(2013).
Governatori, M. & Yim, D. (2012) European Economy. Fiscal Decentralisation and Fiscal Outcomes (Brussels: European Commission), doi: 10.2765/27462.
Halásková, M. & Halásková, R. (2012) The Assessment of the Expenditures of the Local Governments on the Provision of Public Services in the EU, ECON 2012 – selected research papers, 21(2), pp. 140-149.
Halásková, M. & Halásková, R. (2014) Impacts of Decentralization on the Local Government Expenditures and Public Services in the EU Countries, Lex Localis - Journal of Local Self-Government, 12(3), pp. 623-642, doi 10.4335/12.3.623-624(2014).
Horváthová, L., Horváth, J., Gazda, V. & Kubák, M. (2012) Fiscal Decentralization and Public Debt in the European Union, Lex Localis – Journal of Local Self-Government, 10 (3), pp. 265-276.
Chapman, J. I. (2003) Local Government Autonomy and Fiscal Stress: The Case of California Counties, State & Local Government Review, 35(1), pp. 15-25. doi: 10.1177/0160323X0303500102.
Jaworska, N. & Chupetlovska‐Anastasova, A. (2009). A Review of Multidimensional Scaling (MDS) and its Utility in Various Psychological Domains, Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 5(1), pp. 1‐10.
Lessmann, C. H. (2006) Fiscal Decentralization and Regional Disparity: A Panel Data Approach for OECD Countries (Munich: Institute for Economic Research).
Lin, W. C. (2013) Balanced Scorecard and IPA Enables Public Services in Township Management: Local Government Performance, Lex Localis - Journal of Local Self-Government, 11 (1), pp. 21-32.
Maksimovska-Veljanovski, A. & Stojkov, A. (2013) The Future of Fiscal Decentralization in Southeast Europe: What is on the Horizon?, Lex Localis – Journal of Local Self-Government, 11(3), pp. 325-343, doi: 10.4335/11.3.325-343(2013).
Mazzocchi, M. (2008) Statistic for Marketing and Costumer Research (London: Sage).
Musgrave R. A. (1961) Approaches to a fiscal theory of political federalism, In Public Finances: Needs, Sources and Utilization, National Bureau of Economic and social Research (Princeton: University Press), pp. 97-134.
Musgrave, R. A. & Musgrave, P. B. (1989) Public Finance in Theory and Practice (New York: McGraw-Hill).
Neyapti, B. (2010) Fiscal Decentralization and Deficits: International Evidence, European Journal of Political Economy, 26(2), pp. 155-166, doi: 10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2010.01.001.
Oates, W. E. (1993) Fiscal Decentralization and Economic Development, National Tax Journal, 46 (2), pp. 237-243.
OECD (2002) Fiscal Decentralisation in EU Applicant States and Selected EU Member States (Paris: Centre for Tax Policy and Administration).
Oplotnik, Z. J., Brezovnik, B. & Vojinovič, B. (2012) Local Self-Government Financing and Costs of Municipality in Slovenia, Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, (37E), pp. 128-142.
Price, V. C. & Garello, J. (2003) Index of Fiscal Decentralisation: Methodology and Findings, Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines, 13(4), pp. 1-40, doi: 10.2202/1145-6396.1105.
Prud’homme, R. (1994) On the Dangers of Decentralization (Washington, D C: World Bank).
Spahn, P. B. (2013) Measuring decentralisation of public sector activities: Conceptual issues and the case of Germany, In Measuring Fiscal Decentralisation: Concepts and Policies, (OECD and Korea Institute of Public Finance: OECD Publishing), pp. 89-99, doi: 10.1787/9789264174849-8-en.
Stiglitz, J. E. (1997) Economics of the Public Sector (London: Norton & Company New York).
Szarowská, I. (2014) Fiscal decentralisation and economic development in selected unitary European countries, European Financial and Accounting Journal, 9 (1), pp. 22-40.
Tanzi, V. (2001) Pitfalls on the Road to Fiscal Decentralization, Economic Reform Project (Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment).
Vaneecloo, C., Badriotti, A. & Fornasini, M. (2007) Fiscal federalism in the European Union and its countries: a confrontation between theories and facts. (Brussels: P.I. E.- Peter Lang; Oxford).
Vo, D. (2008) Fiscal decentralisation indices: a comparison of two approaches, Rivista di diritto finanziario e scienza delle finanze LXVII‘, 3 (1), pp. 295-323.
Vlček, P. (2011) The Public Administration in the Czech Republic and Data Boxes, In 2nd European Conference of Computer Science (Puerto De La Cruz: WSEAS).
World bank (2014) Decentralization & Subnational Regional Economics (Washington: Worldbank group).
It is a condition that the authors assign copyright or license the publication rights in their articles, including abstracts, to Institute for Local Self-Government Maribor. This enables us to ensure full copyright protection and to disseminate the article, and of course Journal, to the widest possible readership in print and electronic formats as appropriate. Authors retain many rights under the Institutes' right policies, which can be found at journal.lex-localis.press. Authors are themselves responsible for obtaining permission to reproduce copyright material from other sources.