The Utilization of System Dynamics in the Environment: an Example of Waste Management from the City of Znojmo

  • Michal Plaček Private College of Economics Studies Znojmo
  • Milan Půček SVŠE Znojmo, Loucká 42, 669 02 Znojmo
  • Stanislav Čurda SVŠE Znojmo, Loucká 42, 669 02 Znojmo
Keywords: system dynamic, benchmarking, waste management, cost, Znojmo

Abstract

This article deals with applying modern methods of management, particularly benchmarking and system dynamics, to the area of waste management for the city Znojmo. Within the analysis, we focus on the following specific aims: (1) carry out an analysis of waste management utilizing benchmarking, (2) analyze the produced amount of biodegradable waste in Znojmo, (3) describe particular sub-models in relation to biodegradable waste and establish a system dynamic model for dealing with biodegradable waste, which is based on following sub-models. We utilized the following methods: an analysis of resources, benchmarking, structured interviews with experts, objectification of the analysis, and system dynamics modeling of the process. The results are in addition to the analyzed data and applied benchmarking , in particular the diagram of causal loops, which can serve as a tool for a dynamic model and finally help to alert the responsible managers to the basic causalities and links in extremely complex systems such as waste management.

Author Biographies

Michal Plaček, Private College of Economics Studies Znojmo
Department of Economics and Public Administration
Milan Půček, SVŠE Znojmo, Loucká 42, 669 02 Znojmo
Department of Economics and Public Administration
Stanislav Čurda, SVŠE Znojmo, Loucká 42, 669 02 Znojmo
Department of Economics and Public Administration

References

Akkermans, H. A. & van Oorschot, K. E. (2005) Relevance Assumed: a Case Study of Balanced Scorecard Development Using System Dynamics, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 56(8), pp. 931-941, doi: 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601923.
Akkermans, H. & van Oorschot, K. (2002) Developing a Balanced Scorecard with System Dynamics, In: Davidsen, I. (ed.) Proceedings of the 20th International Conference of the System Dynamics Society (Palermo: System Dynamics Society).
Bianchi, C. & Montemaggiore, G. B. (2008) Enhancing Strategy Design and Planning in Water Company, System Dynamics Review, 24(2), pp. 175-213, doi: 10.1002/sdr.395.
Bouckaert, G., Nemec, J., Nakrošis, V., Hajnal, G. & Tonnisson, K. (2009) Public Management Reforms in Central and Eastern Europe (Bratislava: NISPAcee Press).
Bowerman, M., Graham, F., Ball, A. & Fry, J. (2002) The Evolution of Benchmarking in UK Local Authorities, Benchmarking, 9(5), pp. 429-449, doi: 10.1108/14635770210451455.
Burianová, E. (2007) Simulation of dynamic models utilizing system dynamics methods, ISKY2007, In: Cápay, M. (ed.) Molnárová Utilization of operating systems and computer networks to support in the teaching of IT subjects (Nitra:Katedra informatiky Fakulty prírodních vied UKF v Nitre).
Czech Statistical Office (2007) Production, use and disposal of waste (Prague: Czech Statistical Office).
EKO-KOM (2012) The analysis of waste management of the city of Znojmo (Prague: EKO- KOM).
Ellner, S. P & Guckenheimer J. (2006) Dynamic models in Biology (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
Forrester W. J. (1995) The Beginnings of Systems Dynamics, The McKinsey Quarterly, 4, pp.4-16.
Hušek, Z., Šusta, M. & Půček, M. (2006) Application of the Balanced Scorecard method in the public sector (Prague: National informational office for quality support).
Kaplan S. R. & Norton P. D. (1996) Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action (Cambridge: Harvard Business SchoolPress).
Kotoulová, Z. & Váňa, J. (2003) Intensification of collection, transport and sorting of municipal waste, Research project VaV/720/2/00 (Prague: Charles University Prague, Faculty of natural sciences, Centre for environment).
Luna-Reyes, L. F. & Andersen, D. L. (2003) Collecting and Analyzing Qualitative Data for System Dynamics: Methods and Models, System Dynamics Review, 19(4.), pp 271-296, doi: 10.1002/sdr.280.
Magd, H. & Curry, A. (2003) Benchmarking: Achieving Best Value in Public-Sector Organisations, Benchmarking, 10(3), pp. 261-261, doi: 10.1108/14635770310477780.
Malý, I. (1998) Public Goods and Publicly Provided Goods, Political Economy, 6. pp.861-868.
Meřičková, B. & Majlingova, S. (2005) Benchmarking for the provision of services for collection and disposal of solid municipal waste, Public administration, 60(4), pp. 22–23.
Meričková, B., Nemec, J. & Ochrana, F. (2008) Introducing Benchmarking in the Czech Republic and Slovakia: Processes, Problems and Lessons, Public Management Review, 10(5), pp. 673–684, doi:10.1080/14719030802264424.
Meřičková, B., Šumpíková, M. & Rousek, P. (2009) Benchmarking at the level of local self-government - selected problems. In the Theoretical and Practical Aspects of Public Finance (Praha: Oeconomica).
Nemec, J., Vítek, L. & Meričková, B. (2005) Contracting-out at Local Government Level: Theory and Selected Evidence from Czech and Slovak Republics, Public Management Review. 7(4), 638–647. doi: 10.1080/14719030500362900.
Nemec, J. (2010) New Public Management and its Implementation in CEE: What we Know and where do we go, NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 3(1), pp. 31–52, doi: 10.2478/v10110-010-0002-0.
Neshybová, J. (2011) Quality instruments in the public administration and their relationship to municipal budget Brno, Dissertation on Faculty economics and administration (Brno: Masaryk´s University).
Ochrana, F., Šumpíková, M., Nemec, J., Pavel, J. & Meřičková, B. (2007) Efficiency in provision of selected public services at the municipal level (Prague: Oeconomica).
Pánská, L. (2012) Znojmo – Analysis of potential of waste production – Biodegradable waste 2012 (Brno: GEOtest).
Pelánek, R. (2011) Modelling and simulation of complex system (Brno: Masaryk´s University).
Pollitt, Ch. & Bouckaert, G. (2004) Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis (London: Oxford University Press).
Plaček, M. (2013) The Utilization of Benchmarking in the Production and Analysis of Municipal Budgets.Proceedings of the 17th. International Conference.Current Trends in Public Sector Research.1.st. (Brno: Masaryk´s University).
Plaček, M. (2011) New Public Management (Znojmo: SVŠE Znojmo).
Půček, M., Koppitz D. & Sobotka M.,(2013) Practical use of the Dynamic Balanced Scorecard in the City. Proceedings of the 17th. International Conference.Current Trends in Public Sector Research.1.st. (Brno: Masarykova Universita).
Půček, M. & Špaček, D. (2014) Strategic public management – selected experience with BSC implementation, Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 10(41), pp. 146-169.
Randma-Liiv, T. (2008) New Public Management versus Neo-Weberian State in Central and Eastern Europe, Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 1(2), pp. 49-71.
Senge, P. (1990) The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practise of the Learning Organization (New York: Doubleday).
Sloper, P., Linard, K. T. & Paterson, D. (1999) Towards a Dynamic Feedback Framework for Public Sector Performance Management.In: the 17th International System Dynamics Conference (Wellington: System Dynamics Society).
Stave, K. A. (2002) Using System Dynamics to Improve Public Participation in Environmental decisions, System Dynamics Review, 18(2), pp. 139-167, doi: 10.1002/sdr.237.
Sterman, J. D., (2000) Business Dynamics: Systém Thinking and Modelling for a Complex World (Columbus: McGraw Hill).
Sterman, J. D. (2002) All Models are Wrong: Reflections on Becoming a Systems Scientist, System Dynamics Review, 18(4), pp. 501-531, doi: 10.1002/sdr.261.
Tonnisson, Ch. & Wilson, J. (2007) Best Value in Transitional Countries?, Public Management Review, 9(1), pp. 87-106, doi: 10.1080/14719030601181241.
Published
2015-04-19
Section
Articles