Parliament-citizen Communication in Terms of Local Self-government and Their use of Social Media in the European Union

  • Tina Tomazic University of Maribor, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
  • Katja Udir Mišič University of Maribor, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciece
Keywords: social media, government, parliaments, citizen parcitipation, local self-government

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to examine the role of the Parliament and citizen participation in the context of social media in contemporary society, and what role they play in Parliament-citizen communication in terms of local self-government. The paper also reports the state-of-the-art about the existence and use of social media on the websites of Parliaments of the Member States of the European Union. 57% of Parliaments of the Member States of the European Union who responded to the present survey which was conducted in 2016, use Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, video streaming, calendar and notification via RSS (Rich Site Summary). The results are particularly important for further research within local self-government of each of the Member States of the European Union, for providing  better conditions for improving Parliament-citizen communication.

References

Abdelsalam, H.M., Reddick, C., Gamal, S. & Al-shaar, A. (2013) Social Media in Egyptian Government websites: Presence, usage, and effectiveness, Government Information Quarterly, 30(4), pp. 406–416.

Andrews, C. (2015) The Government`s Guide to using Facebook. GovLoop, Facebook. [online] available at: https://www.govloop.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/The-Governments-Guide-to-Using-Facebook.pdf (September 9, 2018).

Anthopoulos, L., Reddick, C. G., Giannakidou, I. & Mavridis, N. (2016) Why e-government projects fail? An analysis of the Healthcare.gov website, Government Information Quarterly, 33(1), pp. 161–173.

Baker, P. M. A., Bricout, J. C., Moon, N. W., Coughlan, B. & Pater, J. (2013) Communities of participation: A comparison of disability and aging identified groups on Facebook and LinkedIn, Telematics and Informatics, 30, pp. 22–34.

Balaban, D. C., Abrudan, M. C., Iancu, I. & Irimieş, C. (2016) Online Communication And PR in Romanian Public Administration. The Case Study of Public Institutions From Transylvania, Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 47, pp. 20–34.

Belanche Gracia, D. & Casaló Ariño, L.V. (2015) Rebuilding public trust in government administrations through e-government actions, Revista Española de Investigación de Marketing ESIC, 19, pp. 1–11.

Bélanger, F. & Carter, L. (2008) Trust and risk in e-government adoption, Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 17(2), pp. 165–176.

Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P., Munson, S. & Glaisyer, T. (2010) Social Media technology and government transparency, IEEE Computer Society, 11(43), pp. 53–59.

Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., & Grimes, J. M. (2012) Promoting transparency and accountability through ICTs, social media, and collaborative e-government, Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 6(1), pp. 78–91.

Bond, R. M., Fariss, C. J., Jones, J. J., Kramer, A. D. I., Marlow, C., Settle, J. E., & Fowler, J. H. (2012) A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization, Nature, 489, pp. 295–298.

Bonsón, E., Royo, S. & Ratkai, M. (2015) Citizens' engagement on local governments' Facebook sites. An empirical analysis: The impact of different media and content types in Western Europe, Government Information Quarterly, 32(1), pp. 52–62.

Boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2008) Social Networking Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, pp. 210–230.

Brezovnik, B. (2014) Contradictions in the Concept of Public Institutes in Slovenian Legislation, Lex Localis- Journal of local self-government, 12 (2), pp. 311-327, doi: 10.4335/12.2.311-327(2014).

Brezovnik, B., Finžgar, M., & Oplotnik, Ž. J. (2016) Fiscal decentralisation in Slovenia (Maribor: Institute for Local Self-Government and Public Procurement). [online] available at: http://www.lex-localis.info/ebook/2016/fiscaldecentralisation (February 10, 2019).

Brezovšek, M. & Kukovič, S. (2012) Democracy and Participation at Local Level (Conceptual Aspect), In: Bačlija, I. (ed.) Local Democracy IV: Recent problems of Slovenian local self-government (Maribor: Lex localis- Institute for Local Government and Public Procurement).

Chun, S. A. & Luna-Reyes, L. (2012) Social media in government, Government Information Quarterly, 29(4), pp. 441–445.

Colleoni, E., Rozza, A. & Arvidsson, A. (2014) Echo chamber or public sphere? Predicting political orientation and measuring political homophily in Twitter using big data, Journal of Communication, 64(2), pp. 317–332.

De Jong, M. & Lentz, L. (2006) Scenario evaluation of municipal Web sites: Development and use of an expert-focused evaluation tool, Government Information Quarterly, 23(2), pp. 191–206.

Erlingsson, G. O. & Ödalen, J. (2017) A Normative Theory of Local Government: Connecting Individual Autonomy and Local Self-Determination with Democracy, Lex localis - Journal of Local Self-Government, 15(2), pp. 329-323.

Fisher Liu, B., & Horsley, J.S. (2007) The government communication decision wheel: Toward a public relations model for the public sector, Journal of Public Relations Research, 19(4), pp. 377–393.

Graham, M. W., Avery, J. E. & Park, S. (2015) The role of social media in local government crisis communications, Public Relations Review, 41, pp. 386–394.

Haro-de-Rosario, A., Sáez-Martín, A., & Caba-Pérez, M. C. (2018) Using social media to enhance citizen engagement with local government: Twitter or Facebook?, New media & society, 20(1), pp. 29–49.

Hofmann, S., Beverungen, D., Räckers, M., & Becker, J. (2013a) What makes local governments' online communications successful? Insights from a multi-method analysis of Facebook, Government Information Quarterly, 30(4), pp. 387–396.

Hofmann, S., Räckers, M., Beverungen, D., & Becker, J. (2013b) Old blunders in new media? How local governments communicate with citizens in online social networks, Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. [online] available at: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/d1ee/7984bbe9a9cf50cdbeb1c4c135632592b003.pdf (September 9, 2016).

Janssen, M., Kuk, G., & Wagenaar, R. (2008) A survey of Web-based business models for e-government in the Netherlands, Government Information Quarterly, 25(2), pp. 202–220.

Jansen, B.J., Zhang, M.M., Sobel, K., & Chowdury, A. (2009) Twitter power: Tweets as electronic word of mouth, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(11), pp. 2169–2188.

Joon Kim, B., & Robinson, S. (2012) Social Media and Web 2.0 for Rethinking E-Government Maturity Models, In: Downey, E. & Jones, M. (eds.) Public Service Governance and 2.0 Technologies: Future Trends in Social Media (USA: IGI-Global), pp. 250-265.

Kaplan, A.M., & Haenlein, M. (2010) Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media, Business Horizons, 53(1), pp. 59–68.

Kavanaugh, A., Fox, E., Sheetz, S., Yang, S., Li, L., Shoemaker, D., Natsev, A. & Xie., L. (2012) Social media use by government: From the routine to the critical, Government Information Quarterly, 29(4), pp. 480–491.

Kietzmann, J. H., Silvestre, B.S., McCarthy, I. P., & Pitt, L. F. (2012) Unpacking the social media phenomenon: towards a research agenda, Journal of Public Affairs, 12(2), pp. 109–119.

Lang, S. (2004) Local Political Communication: Media and Local Publics in the Age of Globalization, In: Esser, F. & Pfetsch, B. (eds.) Comparing Political Communication (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

Larsson, A. O. & Moe, H. (2011) Studying political microblogging: Twitter users in the 2010 Swedish election campaign, New Media & Society, 14(5), pp. 729–747.

Larsson, H. & Grönlund, Å. (2016) Sustainable eGovernance? Practices, problems and beliefs about the future in Swedish eGov practice, Government Information Quarterly, 33(1), pp. 105–114.

Layne, K., & Lee, J. (2001) Developing fully functional e-government: A four stage model, Government Information Quarterly, 18(2), pp. 122–136.

Linders, D. (2012) From e-government to we-government: Defining a typology for citizen coproduction in the age of social media, Government Information Quarterly, 29(4), pp. 446–454.

Magro, M.J. (2012) A review of social media use in e-government, Administrative Sciences, 2, pp. 148–161.

Margetts, H., John, P., Hall, A.S. & Yassen, T. (2015) Political Turbulence: How Social Media Shape Collective Action (USA: Princeton University Press).

Mayfield, A. (2006) What is social media? [online], available at: http://www.spannerworks.com/fileadmin/uploads/eBooks/What is Social Media.pdf (August 16, 2018).

Missingham, R. (2011) E-parliament: Opening the door, Government Information Quarterly, 28(3), pp. 426–434.

Oliveira, G. H. M. & Welch, E. W. (2013) Social media use in local government: Linkage of technology, task, and organizational context, Government Information Quarterly, 30(4), pp. 397–405.

Panagiotopoulos, P., Barnett, J. & Brooks, L. (2013) Social Media and government responsiveness: The case of the UK Food Standards Agency, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 8074, pp. 310–321.

Păuş, V. (2016) Leadership Strategies in Promoting the Image of the Mayors on the Websites of Sector Town Halls and of Bucharest City Hall, Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 47, pp. 146–163.

Prensky, M. (2010) Why YouTube matters. Why it is so important, why we should all be using it, and why blocking it blocks our kids' education, On the Horizon, 18(2), pp. 124–131.

Ranta, A. E. (2011) The Communication of Local Public Authorities with Mass-Media. Effects and Best Practices, Transylvanian Review of Administrative Science, 34, pp. 201–216.

Roberts, N. (2004) Public Deliberation in an Age of Direct Citizen Participation, American Review of Public Administration, 34(4), pp. 315–53.

Sobkowicz, P., Kaschesky, M., & Bouchard, G. (2012) Opinion mining in social media: Modeling, simulating, and forecasting political opinions in the web, Government Information Quarterly, 29(4), pp. 470–479.

Stamati, T., Papadopoulos, T., & Anagnostopoulos, D. (2015) Social media for openness and accountability in the public sector: Cases in the Greek context, Government Information Quarterly, 32(1), pp. 12–29.

Tomažič, T., & Bessa Vilela, N. (2017) Ongoing Criminal Activities in Cyberspace: From the Protection of Minors to the Deep Web, Revija za kriminalistiko in kriminologijo, 68, pp. 412–423.

Tomažič, T. (2017) The importance of social media from the wine marketing perspective, Lex localis – Journal of Local Self- Government, 15(4), pp. 827–844.

Trent, J. S., Friedenberg, Robert, R. V. & Denton, R. E. (2011) Political Campaign Communication: Principles and Practices (Lanham, Boulder, New York, London: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.).

Warkentin, M., Gefen, D., Pavlou, P. & Rose, G. (2002) Encouraging citizen adoption of e-government by building trust, ElectronicMarkets, 12(3), pp. 157-162.

Yang, S., Quan-Haase, A. & Rannenberg, K. (2016) The changing public sphere on Twitter: Network structure, elites and topics of the #righttobeforgotten, New Media & Society, 19(2), pp. 1983-2002.

Published
2019-10-30
Section
Articles