Influence of Municipalities on LAG's Effectiveness in Attracting Project Subsidies in Croatia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4335/18.1.35-52(2020)Keywords:
local action group, local development, LAG's effectiveness, project subsidies, CroatiaAbstract
Local Action Groups LAGs are tri-sectoral bodies in which the economic and civil sectors in partnership with the public sector use EU policy funds for rural development. In such a decentralized approach to community led local development there is a risk of excessive municipal interference and principles of bottom-up development can be compromised. The basic assumption by which the leading public sector is trying to justify itself as having a better administrative capacity that can help LAGs to attract and absorb subsidies is statistically tested in this paper. Example of Croatia has shown that “municipalisation” of local partnerships have no justifications, as increasing the share of public partners in the membership structure reduces LAG effectiveness in attracting project subsidies, and in the same time municipalities that prove stronger absorptive capacity through larger share of EU funds in their budget, show no positive influence transferred to LAGs in which they are members.
References
Argiolas, G., Cabras, S., Dessì, C, & Floris, M. (2009) Building innovative models of territorial governance, Journal of Place Management and Development, 2(3), pp. 178–210.
Bosworth, G., Annibal, I., Carroll, T., Price, L., Sellick, J. & Shepherd, J. (2016) Empowering Local Action through Neo Endogenous Development; The Case of LEADER in England, Sociologia Ruralis, 56(3), pp. 427-449.
CEC (2005) Council Regulation No 1698/2005 of 20 September 2005 on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD).
Chevalier, P., Mačiulyté, J., Razafimahefa, L. & Dedeire, M. (2017) The Leader Programme as a Model of Institutional Transfer: Learning from Its Local Implementation in France and Lithuania, European Countryside, 9(2), pp. 317-341.
Croatian LEADER Network, LEADER, available at: http://www.lmh.hr/leader-clld/leader (July 2, 2018).
Dax, T., Strahl, W., Kirwan, J. & Maye, D. (2016) The Leader programme 2007–2013: Enabling or disabling social innovation and neo-endogenous development? Insights from Austria and Ireland, European Urban and Regional Studies, 23(1), pp. 56-68.
Esparcia, J., Escribano, J. & Serrano, J. J. (2015) From development to power relations and territorial governance: Increasing the leadership role of LEADER Local Action Groups in Spain, Journal of Rural Studies, 42, pp. 29-42.
European Commission (2006) The LEADER approach (Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities).
European Court of Auditors (2010) Implementation of the LEADER Approach for Rural Development, Special Report No. 5 (Luxembourg: Publication Office of the European Union).
Farrell G., Thirion S. (2005) Social capital and rural development: from win–lose to win–win with the LEADER initiative, In: Schmied D. (ed) Winning and Losing: The Changing Geography of Europe’s Rural Areas (Ashgate, Aldershot).
Halamska M. (2011) Sceny rozwoju lokalnego w Polsce: dekoracje i aktorzy, Wieś i Rolnictwo, 4(153), pp. 103–120.
High C. & Nemes G. (2007) Social Learning in LEADER: Exogenous, Endogenous and Hybrid Evaluation in Rural Development, Sociologia Ruralis, 47(2), pp. 103-119.
HMRR - Hrvatska mreža za ruralni razvoj (2017) Hrvatski LAG-ovi, available at: http://www.hmrr.hr/hr/leader/hrvatski-lagovi/ (February 14, 2018).
Knieć W. (2007) Władza w LGD, Kwartalnik Leader+, 4, pp. 18–19.
Kovach, I. (2000) LEADER, a new social order, and the central eand East-European countries, Sociolgia Ruralis, 40(2), pp. 181-189.
Kovach, I., Kucerova, E. (2006) The project class in central Europe: the Czech and Hungarian cases, Sociologia Ruralis 46(1), pp. 3-21.
Lacquement, G. & Raynal, J. (2013) Acteurs et ressources du développement local en Allemagne orientale : le territoire rural au prisme des projets du programme européen LEADER, Annales de géographie, 692(4), pp. 393-421.
Lopolito, A., Nardone, G. & Sisto, R. (2011) Towards a comprehensive evaluation of local action groups in LEADER programmes, New Medit, 10(1), pp. 43-49.
Łukasz Sykała, L., Dej, M. & Wolski, O. (eds) (2015) The LEADER Method. Transferring Experience of the Visegrad Group Countries to Georgia (Krakow: Institute of Urban Development).
Ministry of Agriculture (2014) Rural Development Programme of the Republic of Croatia for the Period 2014-2020, available at https://ruralnirazvoj.hr/files/documents/Programme_2014HR06RDNP001_6_1_hr.pdf (February 10, 2019).
O'Keeffe, B. (2009) Regional and Local Devolution in Ireland - the Potential of LEADER Partnerships to Provide Municipal Government, Lex Localis-Journal of Local Self-Government, 7(3), pp. 257-269.
Ott, K., Bronić, M., Petrušić, M. & Stanić, B. (2016) Budget transparency in Croatian counties, cities and municipalities (November 2015–March 2016), Newsletter: povremeno glasilo Instituta za javne finacije, 17(108), pp. 1-11.
Ott, K., Bronić, M., Petrušić, M. & Stanić, B. (2018) Budget transparency in Croatian counties, cities and municipalities (November 2017-March 2018), Newsletter: povremeno glasilo Instituta za javne finacije, 19(115), pp. 1-14.
Ray C., (2000), Endogenous socio-economic development in the European Union – issues of evaluation, Journal of Rural Studies, 16(4), pp.447-458.
Ray C., (2006) Neo-endogenous rural development in the EU, In: Cloke P., Marsden T. & Mooney, P. (eds) Handbook of Rural Studies, (London: Sage).
Teilmann, K. A. & Thuesen, A. A. (2014) Important Types of LAG–Municipality Interaction When Collaborating on Rural Development: Lessons from Danish LEADER LAGs, International Journal of Rural Management, 10(1), pp. 21-45.
Vrabková I. & Šaradín P. (2017) The technical efficiency of local action groups: a Czech Republic case study, Acta Universitatis agriculturae et silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 65(3), pp. 1065-1074.
Zajda, K. (2014) Problems of functioning of Polish local action groups from the perspective of the social capital concept, Eastern European Countryside, 20(1), pp. 73-97.
