Size and Democracy Revisited A Critical Discussion of the Claimed Trade-off between Problem-Solving Capacity and Citizen Participation

  • Asbjørn Røiseland Nord University, Faculty of Social Sciences
  • Signy I Vabo University of Oslo, Institute of Political Science
Keywords: local government, citizen effectiveness, citizen participation, system capacity, governance capacity

Abstract

Classic literature on size and democracy argues that there is a trade-off between opportunities for broad citizen participation and communities’ ability to deal effectively with the challenges faced by their locality. Consequently, smaller political units enrich democracy, while larger units strengthen the capacity to govern. We argue that although the trade-off may be relevant within a framework concentrating on representative democratic institutions, the trade-off is questionable in the light of more recent contributions on democratic, network-based governance. The article develops this argument, and suggests elements that should be included in a revised theory of municipal size.

References

Ansell, C. & Torfing, J. (2015) How does collaborative governance scale?, Policy and Politics, 43(3), pp. 315-329, http://dx.doi.org/10.1332/030557315X14353344872935.

Arnstein, S. R. (1969) A ladder of citizen participation, Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), pp. 216-224.

Baldersheim, H. & Rose, L. E. (eds.) (2010) Territorial choice: The politics of boundaries and borders (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).

Barber, B. R. (1984) Strong democracy. Participatory politics for a new age (Berkely, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press).

Barker, E. (1946) The Politics of Aristotle (Oxford: The Clarendon Press).

Benz, A. & Papadopoulos, Y. (2006) Introduction - Governance and democracy: Concepts and key issues, In: Benz, A. & Papadopoulos, Y. (eds.) Governance and democracy. Comparing national, European and international experiences (London: Routledge).

Blom‐Hansen, J., Houlberg, K. & Serritzlew, S. (2014) Size, Democracy, and the Economic Costs of Running the Political System, American Journal of Political Science, 58(4), pp. 790-803, https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12096.

Blom-Hansen, J., Houlberg, K. Serritzlew, S. & Treisman, D. (2016) ‘urisdiction Size and Local Government Policy Expenditure: Assessing the Effect of Municipal Amalgamation, American Political Science Review, 110(4), pp. 812-831.

Boyte, H. C. (2005) Reframing Democracy: Governance, civic agency, and politics, Public Administration Review, 65(5), pp. 536-546.

Brewer, B. (2007) Citizen or consumer? Complaints handling in the public sector, International review of administrative sciences, 73, pp. 608-619.

Crozier, M. P. (2010) Rethinking systems: Configurations of Politics and Policy in contemporary governance, Administration & Society, 42(5), pp. 504-525.

Dahl, R. A. (19679 The City in the Future of Democracy, The American Political Science Review, 61(4), pp. 953-970, https://doi.org/10.2307/1953398.

Dahl, R. A. (1997) Toward Democracy: A journey (Barkley: University of California, Institute of Governmental Studies Press).

Dahl, R. A. & Tufte, E. R. (1973) Size and Democracy (Stanford: Stanford University Press).

Dalton, R. J., Scarrow, S. E. & Cain, B. E. (2004) Advanced democracies and the new politics, Journal of Democracy, 15(1), pp. 124-138.

Denters, B., Goldsmith, M. J. Ladner, A., Mouritzen, P. E., Rose, L. E. & Geurts, P. (2014) Size and local democracy (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar).

Diamond, L. (2008) The spirit of democracy. The struggle to build free societies throughout the world (New York: Times Books).

Floridia, A. (2017) From participation to deliberation - a critical genealogy of deliberative democracy (Colchester, UK: ECPR Press).

Geissel, B. & Newton, K. (eds.) (2012) Evaluating Democratic Innovations. Curing the democratic malaise? (New York: Routledge).

Gendzwill, A. & Swianiewicz, P. (2016) Does Local Democracy Perform Better in Smaller Jurisdictions? Survey Evidence from Poland, Lex Localis – Journal of Local Self-Government, 14(4), pp.759-782.

Gilley, B. (2006) The meaning and measure of state legitimay: Results for 72 countries, European Journal of Political Research, 45, pp. 499-525.

Gustavsen, A., Røiseland, A. & Pierre,J. (2014) Procedure or performance? Assessing citizen's attitudes toward legitimacy in Swedish and Norwegian local government, Urban Research & Practice, 7(2), pp. 200-212.

Heinelt, H., Sweeting, D. & Getimis, P. (eds.) (2006) Legitimacy and urban governance. A Cross-national comparative study (London: Routledge).

Howlett, M. & Ramesh, M. (2016) Achilles' heels of governance: Critical capacity deficits and their role in governance failures, Regulation & Governance, 10(4), pp. 301-313.

Kjellberg, F. (1985) Local Government Reorganization and the Development of the Welfare State, Journal of Public Policy, 5(2), pp. 215-239.

Klausen, J. E., Sweeting, D. & Howard, J. (2006) Community involvement and legitimation in urban governance: an empirical analysis, In: Heintel, H., Sweeting, D. & Getimis, P. (eds.) Legitimacy and urban governance. A Cross-national comparative study (London: Routledge).

Larssen, D. D. & Serritzlew, S. (2011) Jurisdiction Size and Local Democracy: Evidence on Internal Political Efficacy from Large-scale Municipal Reform, American Political Science Review, 105(2), pp. 238-258.

Lindgren, K-O. & Persson, T. (2010) Input and output legitimacy: synergy or trade-off? Empirical evidence from an EU survey, Journal of European Public Policy, 4, pp. 449-67.

Nabatchi, T. & Leighninger, M. (2015) Public Participation for 21st Century Democracy (New Jersey: Jossey-Bass. A Wiley Brand).

Newton, K. (1982) Is small really so beautiful? Is big really so ugly? Size, effect, effectiveness, and democracy in local government, Political Studies, 30, pp. 190-206.

Oates, W. E. (1999) An Essay on Fiscal Federalism, Journal of Economic Literature, 37(3), pp. 1120-1149.

Ostrom, V., Tiebout, C. & Warren, R. (1961) The organization of government in metropolitan areas: a theoretical inquiry, American Political Science Review, 55(4), pp. 831-842.

Pateman, C. (1970) Participation and Democratic Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

Painter, M. & Pierre, J. (eds.) (2005a) Challenges to state policy capacity - Global trends and comparative perspectives (Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave).

Painter, M. & Pierre, J. (2005b) Unpacking policy capacity: Issues and themes, In: Painter, M. & Pierre, J. (eds.) Challenges to state policy capacity. Global trends and comparative perspectives (New York: Palgrave Macmillan).

Peters, B. G. & Pierre, J. (2006) Governance, accountability and democratic legitimacy, In: Benz, A. & Papadopoulos, Y. (eds.) Governance and democracy. Comparing national, European and international experiences (London: Routledge).

Peters, B. G. (2011) Steering, rowing, drifting or sinking? Changing patterns of governance, Urban Research & Practice, 4(1), pp. 5-12.

Peters, B. G. & Pierre, J. (2004) Multi-level governance and democracy: A Faustian bargain?, In: Backe, I. & Flinders, M. (eds.) Multilevel Governance (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

Putnam, R. D. (2000) Bowling alone. The collapse and revival of American community (New York: Simon & Schuster).

Rhodes, R. A. W. (1981) Control and Power in Central-Local Government Relations (Farnborough: Gower).

Risse, T. (2006) Transnational governance and legitimacy, In: Benz, A. & Papadopoulos, Y. (eds) Governance and Democracy (London: Routledge), pp. 179–199.

Rothstein, B. & Teorell, J. (2008) What is quality of government: A theory of impartial political institutions, Governance - an International Journal of Policy and Administration, 21(2), pp. 165-190.

Rothstein, B. (2010) Nycklarna till politisk legitimitet, In: Andersson, S., Bergh, A., Elingsson, G. O. & Sjölin, M. (eds.) Korruption, maktmissbruk och legitimitet (Stockholm: Norstedts).

Smith, G. (2009) Democratic Innovations. Designing Institutions for Citizen Participation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

Steiner, R., Kaiser, C., Tapscott, C. & Navarro, C. (2018) Is local always better? Strengths and limitations of local governance for service delivery, International Journal of Public Sector Management, 31(4), pp. 394-409, https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-05-2018-226.

Sørensen, E. & Torfing, J. (2017) Strengthening interactive political leadership by designing arenas for collaborative policy innovation, PUPOL, Milton Keynes 5-7 April 2017.

Sørensen, E. & Torfing, J. (2018) The democratizing impact of governance networks: From pluralization, via democratic anchorage, to interactive political leadership, Public administration, 96(2), pp. 1-16.

Swianiewicz, P. (ed.) (2010) Territorial Consolidation Reforms in Europe (Budapest: Open Society Institute).

Torfing, J. & Triantafillou, P. (eds.) (2011) Interactive policy making, metagovernance and democracy (Essex: ECPR Press).

Torfing, J., Peters, B. G., Pierre, J. & Sørensen, E. (2012) Interactive governance. Advancing the paradigm (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

Torfing, J., Sørensen, E. & Røiseland, A. (2017) Transforming the public sector into an arena for co-creation: Barriers, Drivers, Benefits and Ways forward, Administration and Society, 51(5), pp. 795-825.

Voorberg, W., Bekkers, V. & Tummers, L. (2015) A systematic review of co-creation and co-production: Embarking on the social innovation journey, Public Management Review, 17(9), pp. 1333–1357.

Published
2019-04-30
Section
Articles