What Propels Municipal Governments to Collaborate? The Case of Thematic Environmental Association in Chile

  • Karina Arias Yurisch Universidad de Santiago de Chile, USACH
  • Luis Garrido-Vergara Universidad de Santiago de Chile, USACH
Keywords: intermunicipal collaboration, municipal governments, thematic associations, environmental issues, Chile

Abstract

Although it is widely accepted that inter-local agreements can enhance municipal governments’ capacity to provide complex services, there is little evidence in the Latin American case to explain why municipalities decide to collaborate with each other. What propels municipal governments to collaborate? Using data from Chilean government this paper identifies and analyzes the determinants of inter-local collaboration to address environmental issues. Five logit models are used for the empirical analysis. The results show that this form of cooperation is determined by poverty, population size, municipal fiscal capacity, and the degree of urbanization of local communities.

References

Agranoff, R. (2007) Managing within networks: Adding value to public organizations (Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press).

Agranoff, R. & McGuire, M. (2003) Inside the matrix: Integrating the paradigms of intergovernmental and network management, International Journal of Public Administration, 26(12), pp.1401-1422, https://doi.org/10.1081/PAD-120024403.

Agranoff, R. & McGuire, M. (2004) Collaborative public management: New strategies for local governments (Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press).

Alter, C. & Hage, J. (1993) Organizations working together (New York: SAGE Library of Social Research).

Bae, J. & Feiock, R. (2012) Managing multiplexity: Coordinating multiple services at a regional level, State and Local Government Review, 44(2), pp. 162-168, https://doi.org/10.1177/0160323X12446152.

Bai, X. (2007) Integrating global environmental concerns into urban management: The scale and readiness arguments, Journal of Industrial Ecology, pp. 15-29, https://doi.org/10.1162/jie.2007.1202.

Bel, G. Fageda, X. & Mur, M. (2013) Why do municipalities cooperate to provide local public services? An empirical analysis, Local Government Studies, 39(3), pp.435-454, https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2013.781024.

Burnham, K. P. & Anderson, D.R. (1998) Model Selection and Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretical Approach (New York: Springer-Verlag).

Callanan, M. (2012) Subnational collective action: the varied patterns of mobilisation of local government associations, Local Government Studies, 38(6), pp.753-775, https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2012.683863.

Caulfield, J. (2002) Local government finance in OECD Countries, In: Caulfield J. & Larsen H. (eds.) Local government at the millennium (Opladen: Leske and Budrich).

Coyne, R. (2005) Wicked problems revisited, Design studies, 26(1), pp. 5-17, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2004.06.005.

DiMaggio, P. & Powell W. (1983) The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields, American Sociological Review, 48(2), pp. 147-60, https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101.

Feiock, R. C. (2013) The institutional collective action framework, Policy Studies Journal, 41(3), pp. 397-425, https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12023.

Gulati, R. & Gargiulo, M. (1999) Where Do Interorganizational Networks Come From?, American Journal of Sociology, 104(5), pp.1439-1493, https://doi.org/10.1086/210179.

Hawkins, C. V. & Wang, X. (2012) Sustainable development governance: Citizen participation and support networks in local sustainability initiatives, Public Works Management & Policy, 17(1), pp.7-29, https://doi.org/10.1177/1087724X11429045.

Hawkins, C. V. (2011) Smart growth policy choice: A resource dependency and local governance explanation, Policy Studies Journal, 39(4), pp. 679-707, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2011.00427.x.

Hefetz, A., Warner M. & Vigoda-Gadot E. (2012) Privatization and inter-municipal contracting: The US local government experience 1992-2007, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 30(4), pp. 675-692, https://doi.org/10.1068/c11166.

Hoaglin, D. C. & Iglewicz B. (1987) Fine-tuning some resistant rules for outlier labeling, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 82(400), pp. 1147-1149, https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1987.10478551.

Klijn, E. H. (2003) Networks and governance: a perspective on public policy and public administration, Governing Networks: EGPA Yearbook, 22(1), pp. 29-38, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00662.x.

Kołsut, B. (2016) Inter-Municipal Cooperation in Waste Management: The Case of Poland, Quaestiones Geographicae, 35(2), pp. 91-104, https://doi.org/10.1515/quageo-2016-0018.

Krause, R. M. (2011) Policy innovation, intergovernmental relations, and the adoption of climate protection initiatives by U.S. cities, Journal of Urban Affairs, 33(1), pp. 45-60, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9906.2010.00510.x.

Krause, R. M. (2012) An assessment of the impact that participation in local climate networks has on cities’ implementation of climate, energy, and transportation policies, Review of Policy Research, 29(5), pp.585-604, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2012.00582.x.

Kwon, S. W. & Feiock R. (2010) Overcoming the barriers to cooperation: Intergovernmental service agreements, Public Administration Review, 70(6), pp. 876-884, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02219.x.

Ladd, H. F. (1992) Population growth, density and the costs of providing public services, Urban Studies, 29(2), pp. 273-295, https://doi.org/10.1080/00420989220080321.

LeRoux, K. & Carr J.B. (2007) Explaining local government cooperation on public works: evidence from Michigan, Public Works Management and Policy, 12(1), pp. 344–58, https://doi.org/10.1177/1087724X07302586.

Levin, J. & Tadelis S. (2010) Contracting for government services: Theory and evidence from US cities, The Journal of Industrial Economics, 58(3), pp. 507-541, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6451.2010.00430.x.

Lubell, M., Feiock R. & Handy S. (2009) City adoption of environmentally sustainable policies in California's Central Valley, Journal of the American Planning Association, 75(3), pp. 293-308, https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360902952295.

Marcel, M. (1994) Decentralization and Development: The Chilean Experience, In: Ranis, G. (ed.) Route to Modern Growth: Essays in Honor of Carlos Díaz-Alejandro (Washington D.C: Johns Hopkins University Press), pp. 79-121.

Mazzalay, V. H., Camps H. R. & Sarmiento G. (2006) Relaciones de cooperación intermunicipal en la Región Central de Córdoba: estructuras perceptivas como condicionante, Studia Politicae, 7(1), pp. 77-114, https://doi.org/10.22529/sp.

McGuire, M. (2002) Managing networks: Propositions on what managers do and why they do it, Public administration review, 62(5), pp. 599-609, https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6210.00240.

McGuire, M. & Silvia C. (2010) The Effect of Problem Severity, Managerial and Organizational Capacity, and Agency Structure on Intergovernmental Collaboration: Evidence from Local Emergency Management, Public Administration Review, 70(2), pp. 279-288, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02134.x.

Ministerio del Interior (1992) Modifica la Ley 18,695 Orgánica Constitucional de Municipalidades, available at: http://www.leychile.cl/Navegar?idNorma=30497 (May 4, 2018).

Morelli, J. (2011) Environmental sustainability: A definition for environmental professionals, Journal of Environmental Sustainability, 1(1), pp. 1-10, https://doi.org/10.14448/jes.01.0002.

Subsecretaria de Desarrollo Regional y Administrativo. (2008) Programa de Fortalecimiento de Asociaciones de Municipalidades, Unidad de acción estratégica, Departamento. Desarrollo Municipal, available at: http://asociativismo.subdere.gov.cl/programa/programa-fortalecimiento-asociaciones-municipales-pfam (May 10, 2018).

O'Toole Jr, L. & Meier, K. J. (2004) Public management in intergovernmental networks: Matching structural networks and managerial networking, Journal of public administration research and theory, 14(4), pp. 469-494, https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muh032.

Oviatt, B. (1998) Agency and Transaction Cost Perspectives on the Manager–Shareholder Relationship: Incentives for Congruent Interests, Academy of Management Review, 13(2), pp. 214–225, https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1988.4306868.

Pfeffer, J. & Salancik, G. R. (1978) The external control of organizations: A resource dependence approach (New York: Harper and Row Publishers).

Piterman, A. Rezende, S. C., & Heller, L. (2016) Social capital as a key concept for the assessment of success consortiums: the case of CISMAE, Paraná, Brazil, Engenharia Sanitaria e Ambiental, 21(4), pp. 825-834, http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s1413-41522016131791.

Rabe, B. G. (2004) Statehouse and greenhouse: The emerging politics of American climate change (Washington DC: The Brookings Institution).

Ramirez de la Cruz, E. E. (2009) Local political institutions and smart growth: An empirical study of the politics of compact development, Urban Affairs Review, 45(2), pp. 218-246, https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087409334309.

Rittel, H. W. & Webber, M. M. (1973) Dilemmas in a general theory of planning, Policy sciences, 4(2), pp. 155-169, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405730 (1973).

Rodríguez Oreggia, E. & Tuirán Gutiérrez, R. (2006) La cooperación intermunicipal en México Barreras e incentivos en la probabilidad de cooperar, Gestión y Política Pública, 15(2), pp. 393-409.

Rosenzweig, C., Solecki, W., Hammer, S. A. & Mehrotra, S. (2010) Cities lead the way in climate action, Nature, 467, pp. 909-911, https://doi.org/10.1038/467909a.

Shrestha, M. K. & Feiock, R. (2011) Transaction cost, exchange embeddedness, and interlocal cooperation in local public goods supply, Political Research Quarterly, 64(3), pp. 573-558, https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912910370683.

Snavely, K. & Desai, U. 2001. Municipal government-nonprofit sector collaboration in Bulgaria: an attitudinal analysis, The American Review of Public Administration, 31(1), pp. 49-65, https://doi.org/10.1177/02750740122064839.

Soukopová, J. & Vaceková, G. 2018. Internal factors of intermunicipal cooperation: what matters most and why?, Local Government Studies, 44(1), pp. 105-126, https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2017.1395739.

Van Bueren, E.M., Klijn, E.H. & Koppenjan J.F. (2003) Dealing with wicked problems in networks: Analyzing an environmental debate from a network perspective, Journal of public administration research and theory, 13(2), pp. 193-212, https://doi.org/10.1093/jpart/mug017.

Warner, M. & Hefetz, A. (2002) Applying market solutions to public services: An assessment of efficiency, equity, and voice, Urban Affairs Review, 38(1), pp. 70-89, https://doi.org/10.1177/107808702401097808.

Weber, E. P. & Khademian, A.M. (2008) Wicked problems, knowledge challenges, and collaborative capacity builders in network settings, Public Administration Review, 68(2), pp. 334-349, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00866.x.

Yáñez, J. & Letelier, L. (1995) Chile. Fiscal Decentralization in Latin America, In: Murphy, R. L. (ed.) Fiscal Decentralization in Latin America (Washington D.C.: Inter-American Development Bank).

Ylönen, A. (1989) Local leadership and Bureaucratic Legitimacy, In: Clarke, S. (editor) Urban Innovation and Autonomy: Political implications of policy change (Newbury Park CA: Sage), pp. 128-152.

Published
2019-01-20
Section
Articles