Regional Influence or Institutional Constraints? Impact of Interstate Competition and Fiscal Rules on User Charge Reliance across U.S States

  • Koomin Kim Florida State University, Askew School of Public Administration and Policy
Keywords: user charge reliance, interstate competition, fiscal rules, tax efforts, citizen ideology

Abstract

Few studies have been conducted to analyze influential factors of state user charge reliance. This study empirically examines the impact of interstate competition and fiscal rules on state user charge reliance between 1991 and 2014 by applying panel data analysis. Also, this study aims to investigate mechanisms of state user charge reliance and various variables related to user charge reliance, which enhances and broadens understanding of factors that affect state user charge reliance. According to this analysis, overall state user charge reliance is mainly explained by interstate competition, fiscal rules, state tax effort, ideological standpoint and income level. Practically, states need to attend to their taxable resources and consider the actual effect of TELs and balanced budget rules in limiting the growth of government. Future research is recommended to examine mechanisms of state specific user charge sources and expand the variables related to user charge reliance.

References

Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations (1982) Tax Capacity of the Fifty States: Methodology and Estimates, 22-23 (Washington, DC: UNT Digital Library).

Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations (1987) Fiscal Discipline in the Federal System: National Reform and the Experience of the States. A-107 (Washington, DC: UNT Digital Library).

Alt, J. E. & Lowry, R. C. (1994). Divided government, fiscal institutions, and budget deficits: Evidence from the States, American Political Science Review, 88(4), pp. 811-828.

Amiel, L., Deller, S. & Stallmann, J. (2009) The construction of a tax and expenditure limitation index for the US (No. 536) (Madison: University of Wisconsin, Agricultural and Applied Economics).

Bahl, R., & Duncombe, W. (1993) State and local debt burdens in the 1980s: A study in contrast, Public Administration Review, 53(1), pp. 31-40.

Bailey, M. A. & Rom, M. C. (2004) A wider race? Interstate competition across health and welfare programs, Journal of Politics, 66(2), pp. 326-347.

Bailey, M. A., Rom, M. C. & Taylor, M. M. (2004) State competition in higher education: A race to the top, or a race to the bottom?, Economics of Governance, 5(1), pp. 53-75.

Baybeck, B., Berry, W. D. & Siegel, D. A. (2011) A strategic theory of policy diffusion via intergovernmental competition, The Journal of Politics, 73(1), pp. 232-247.

Berry, W. D. & Baybeck, B. (2005) Using geographic information systems to study interstate competition, American Political Science Review, 99(4), pp. 505-519.

Berry, F. S. & Berry, W. D. (1990) State lottery adoptions as policy innovations: An event history analysis, American Political Science Review, 84(2), pp. 395-415.

Berry, F. S. & Berry, W. D. (1992) Tax innovation in the states: Capitalizing on political opportunity, American Journal of Political Science, 36(3), pp. 715-742.

Berry, W. D., Ringquist, E. J., Fording, R. C. & Hanson, R. L. (1998) Measuring citizen and government ideology in the American states, 1960-93, American Journal of Political Science, 42(1), pp. 327-348.

Berry, W. D., Fording, R. C. & Hanson, R. L. (2003) Reassessing the “race to the bottom” in state welfare policy, Journal of Politics, 65(2), pp. 327-349.

Berry, W. D., Fording, R. C., Ringquist, E. J., Hanson, R. L. & Klarner, C. E. (2010) Measuring citizen and government ideology in the US states: A re-appraisal, State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 10(2), pp. 117-135.

Besley T., Case A. (1995) Incumbent behavior: Vote-seeking, tax-setting, and yardstick competition, American Economic Review, 85(1), pp. 25–45.

Bowler, S. & Donovan, T. (2004) Evolution in state governance structures: Unintended consequences of state tax and expenditure limitations, Political Research Quarterly, 57(2), pp. 189-196.

Bruce, D., Carroll, D. A., Deskins, J. A. & Rork, J. C. (2007) Road to ruin? A spatial analysis of state highway spending, Public Budgeting & Finance, 27(4), pp. 66-85.

Burge, G. S., & Piper, B. (2012). Strategic fiscal interdependence: county and municipal adoptions of local option sales taxes, National Tax Journal, 65(2), pp. 387-416.

Camobreco, J. F. (1998) Preferences, Fiscal Policies, and the Initiative Process, The Journal of Politics, 60(3), pp. 819-829.

Carroll, D. A. (2005) Are state governments prepared for fiscal crises? A look at revenue diversification durring the 1990’s, Public Finance Review, 33(5), pp. 603–633.

Clingermayer, J. C., & Dan Wood, B. (1995). Disentangling patterns of state debt financing, American Political Science Review, 89(1), pp. 108-120.

Compson, M. L. (2003). Historical estimates of total taxable resources for US states, 1981–2000, Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 33(2), pp. 55-72.

Conway, K. S. & Rork, J. C. (2004). Diagnosis murder: The death of state death taxes, Economic Inquiry, 42(4), pp. 537-559.

Creese, A. L. (1991). User charges for health care: A review of recent experience, Health Policy and Planning, 6(4), pp. 309-319.

Cooper, J. A. (2005) Interstate competition and state death taxes: A modern crisis in historical perspective, Pepperdine Law Review, 33, p. 835.

Davis, J. & Nicholson-Crotty, S. (2016) Partisanship and tax competition in the American states, Journal of Public Policy, 36(3), pp. 437-456.

Duncan, D. & Graham, J. (2013) Road user fees instead of fuel taxes: The quest for political acceptability, Public Administration Review, 73(3), pp. 415-426.

Ellis, M. A. & Schansberg, D. E. (1999) The determinants of state government debt Financing. Public Finance Review, 27(6), pp. 571-587.

Ferraresi, M., Galmarini, U. & Rizzo, L. (2018). Infrastructure spillovers and strategic interaction: does the size matter?, International Tax and Public Finance, 25(1), pp. 240-272.

Gelbach, J. B. (2004) Migration, the life cycle, and state benefits: How low is the bottom?, Journal of Political Economy, 112(5), pp. 1091-1130.

Gray, V. & Lowery, D. (1996). A Niche Theory of Interest Representation. The Journal of Politics, 58(1), pp. 91-111.

Griffin, D. C. (1992) Welfare gains from user charges for government health services, Health Policy and Planning, 7(2), pp. 177-180.

Hoechle, D. (2007). Robust standard errors for panel regressions with cross-sectional dependence, Stata Journal, 7(3), pp. 281–312.

Johnson, C. L. & Kriz, K. A. (2005). Fiscal institutions, credit ratings, and borrowing costs, Public Budgeting & Finance, 25(1), pp. 84-103.

Jung, C., Eom, T. H., Kim, J., & Sun, R. (2009) Longitudinal effects of user charges on the expenditure level of charge-financed services: The Georgia case (1985-2007), Municipal Finance Journal, 30(3), pp. 1-28.

Kenyon, D. A. & Benker, K. M. (1984). Fiscal discipline: Lessons from the state experience, National Tax Journal, 37(3), pp. 433-446.

Lowry, R. C., Alt, J. E. & Ferree, K. E. (1998). Fiscal policy outcomes and electoral accountability in American states, American Political Science Review, 92(4), pp. 759-774.

Mahdavi, S., & Westerlund, J. (2011) Fiscal stringency and fiscal sustainability: Panel evidence from the American state and local governments, Journal of Policy Modeling, 33(6), pp. 953-969.

Meseguer, C., & Gilardi, F. (2009) What is new in the study of policy diffusion?. Review of International Political Economy, 16(3), pp. 527-543.

Mikesell, J. (2007) Changing State Fiscal Capacity and Tax Effort in an Era of Devolving Government, 1981–2003, Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 37(4), pp. 532–550.

Mullins, D. R. & Joyce, P. G. (1996) Tax and expenditure limitations and state and local fiscal structure: An empirical assessment, Public Budgeting & Finance, 16(1), pp. 75-101.

Nelson, M. A. (2002) Using Excise Taxes to Finance State Government: Do Neighboring State Taxation Policy and Cross‐Border Markets Matter?, Journal of Regional Science, 42(4), pp. 731-752.

Netzer, D. (1992). Differences in reliance on user charges by American state and local governments, Public Finance Quarterly, 20(4), pp. 499-511.

Rogers, P., Silva, R. D. & Bhatia, R. (2002) Water is an economic good: How to use prices to promote equity, efficiency, and sustainability, Water Policy, 4(1), pp. 1-17.

Romans, T. & Subrahmanyam, G. (1979) State and local taxes, transfers and regional economic growth, Southern Economic Journal, 46(2), pp. 435-444.

Rork, J. C. (2003) Coveting thy neighbors' taxation, National Tax Journal, 56(4), pp. 775-787.

Rose, S. (2010) Institutions and fiscal sustainability, National Tax Journal, 63(4), pp. 807-837.

Shipan, C. R. & Volden, C. (2008) The mechanisms of policy diffusion, American Journal of Political Science, 52(4), pp. 840-857.

Sun, R. & Jung, C. (2012) Does user-charge financing reduce expenditure levels for the charge-financed services?, American Review of Public Administration, 42(2), pp. 170–185.

Tannenwald, R. (1999) Fiscal disparity among the states revisited, New England Economic Review, July/August, pp. 3-25.

Tiebout, C. M. (1956) A pure theory of local expenditures, Journal of Political Economy, 64(5), pp. 416-424.

Volden, C. (2002) The politics of competitive federalism: A race to the bottom in welfare benefits?, American Journal of Political Science, 46(2), pp. 352-363.

Walker, J. L. (1969) The diffusion of innovations among the American states, American Political Science Review, 63(3), pp. 880-899.

Winston, C. (1991) Efficient transportation infrastructure policy, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1), pp. 113-127.

Wassmer, R. W. & Fisher, R. C. (2002) Interstate variation in the use of fees to fund K-12 public education, Economics of Education Review, 21(1), pp. 87–100.

Published
2019-01-20
Section
Articles