Sustainable Value as a Tool for Performance Measurement of the Region

  • Jan Fuka University of Pardubice, Faculty of Economics and Administration
  • Petra Lesakova University of Pardubice, Faculty of Economics and Administration
  • Robert Bata University of Pardubice, Faculty of Economics and Administration
Keywords: corporate performance management, new public management, regional government, modification, sustainability, sustainable value


Public servants are confronted with the need to reflect the reality of the changing world. In past decades, managerial methods have begun to penetrate into public administration, which has gained the name of New Public Management . This approach has been criticized by part of both scholars and practitioners, because of the fact that it brings too many economic and managerial principles from the private sector. We think that New Public Management is still open to new challenges, but with emphasizing the values that are typical for public administration. The use of Corporate Performance Management using Sustainable Value methodology can be such challenge. The aim of paper is to introduce, modify and use Sustainable Value as a tool for Corporate Performance Management within New Public Management, for its use at regional level to measure the performance.


Andersen, S. C. (2008) The Impact of Public Management Reforms on Student Performance in Danish Schools, Public Administration, 86, pp. 541–558,

Barkemeyer, R., Figge, F.; Hahn, T., Liesen, A. & Müller, F. (2011) Sustainable Value CO2 Creation by Pulp & Paper Companies (Leeds, Marseille and Berlin: Sustainable Value Research).

Bourne, M., Franco, M., & Wilkes, J. (2003) Corporate performance management. Measuring Business Excellence, 7(3), pp. 15-21,

Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C. & Bloomberg, L. (2014) Public value governance: Moving beyond traditional public administration and the new public management, Public Administration Review, 74(4), pp. 445-456,

Caiden, G. E. (1991) What really is public maladministration?, Public Administration Review, 6(51), pp. 486-493,

CSO (2013) Characteristics of the Pardubice Region, available at: (October 26, 2016).

CSO (2014) Yearbooks 2010 – 2013, available at: (December 10, 2016).

CSO (2015) Yearbooks 2006 – 2014, available at: (January 9, 2017).

CHMI (2014) Inventory results for 1990 to 2014, (January 15, 2017).

De Oliveira, P. (2009) Corporate Performance Management, SSRN Electronic Journal, 8(9–11), https://

Denhardt, R. B., Denhardt, J. V. & Blanc, T. A. (2014) Public administration: An action orientation (Wadsworth: Cengage Learning).

Figge, F. & Hahn, T. (2006) The Advance Guide to Sustainable Value Calculations, available at: (January 16, 2015).

Fiorino, D. J. (2010) Sustainability as a conceptual focus for public administration, Public Administration Review, 70(s1), pp. 78-88,

Fuka, J. & Lešáková, P. (2016) Sustainable Value as a Tool for Corporate Performance Management within New Public Management Framework, WSEAS Transactions on Environment and Development, 12(12), pp. 46-56.

Gerrish, E. (2016) The Impact of Performance Management on Performance in Public Organizations: A Meta‐Analysis. Public Administration Review, 76(1), pp. 48-66,

Geuras, D. & Garofalo, C. (2010) Practical ethics in public administration (Vienna: Management Concepts Inc.).

Hahn, T., Figge, F. & Barkemeyer, R. (2007) Sustainable Value Creation Among Companies in the Manufacturing Sector, International Journal of Environmental Technology and Management, 7(5-6), pp. 496-512,

Laszlo, C. (2008) Sustainable value: How the world's leading companies are doing well by doing good (Palo Alto: Stanford University Press).

Menzel, D. C. (1997) Teaching ethics and values in public administration: Are we making a difference?, Public Administration Review, pp. 224-230,

Neshkova, M. I. & Kostadinova, T. (2012) The effectiveness of administrative reform in new democracies. Public Administration Review, 72(3), pp. 324-333,

Paladino, B. (2010) Innovative corporate performance management: five key principles to accelerate results (Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons).

Paladino, B. & Paladino, J. R. (2011) Innovative Corporate Performance Management. Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance, 22, pp. 63–80,

Poister, T. H., Pasha, O. Q. & Edwards, L. H. (2013) Does performance management lead to better outcomes? Evidence from the US public transit industry, Public Administration Review, 73(4), pp. 625-636,

Rhouma, A. (2010) Sustainable Value in Europe: Sustainability Performance of the Czech Republic Versus the Europe of Fifteen, E+ M Ekonomie a Management, 4, pp. 16-29.

Robson, W. (1964) The Governors and the Governed (London: Allen & Unwin).

Sahoo, S. (2012) Corporate Performance Management, International Journal of Research and Development, 1(1), pp. 9-11.

Stiglitz, J., Sen, A. & Fitoussi, J. P. (2009) The measurement of economic performance and social progress revisited. Reflections and overview (Paris: Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress).

Sustainable Value (2017) FAQ. [online], available at: (January 26, 2017).

Venkatraman, N. U. & Ramanujam, V. (1987) Measurement of business economic performance: An examination of method convergence, Journal of management, 13(1), pp. 109-122,

Vries, J. (2010) Is New Public Management Really Dead?, OECD Journal on Budgeting, 1, p. 87.

Walker M. R., Brewer A. G., Boyne A. G. & Avellaneda N. C. (2011) Market Orientation and Public Service Performance: New Public Management Gone Mad?, Public Administration Review, 71(5), pp. 677-815.

Walker, M. R., Damanpour, F. & Devece, C. A. (2011) Management innovation and organizational performance: The mediating effect of performance management, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(2), pp. 367-386,